Middle of my work day here, but I can't help but interject quickly.
UEI security domains can and should be specified in the launch
configuration dialog. If you look at the output, you can see there is
only *one* security domain available in this emulator for some strange
reason:
S60Emulator.security.domains: thirdparty
Craig
On Feb 15, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Parag Chandra wrote:
Yeah, this run template looks very similar to the run template I
have seen for other UEI emulators. I’ve been able to set the default
trust level for a particular emulator by simply plugging in a value
for the variable %securityDomain%. However, I don’t know if all
emulators support the same trust levels. The ones listed for the Sun
WTK emulators are: manufacturer, minimum, identified_third_party,
unidentified_third_party, maximum. So I guess manufacturer is “allow
access to everything” and at the other end of the scale is maximum.
If you’re not having any luck modifying it this way, you may have to
look at the docs for the emulator/SDK itself. They may provide some
custom way of setting the trust level, either via the emulator
itself or via some configuration file. I was able to adjust the
security level for IBM’s J9 MIDP emulator by editing a text file
somewhere; hopefully something similar is possible.
Parag Chandra
Senior Software Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
404-439-5821
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of nei young
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 1:29 PM
To: eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] EclipseME 1.7.7 vs. S60 3rd emulator
This is the basic setup. But this may be changed. So there is a
variable "securityDomain", I can set it to "maximum" or
"manufacturer"?
%executable% [%debugPort%|-Xdebug -
Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,suspend=y,server=y,address=%debugPort%]
[%classpath%|-classpath "%classpath%"] -Xdevice:%device% [%jadfile
%|"-Xdescriptor:%jadfile%"] [%verbose%|-Xverbose:%verbose%]
[%heapsize%|-Xheapsize:%heapsize%] [%securityDomain%|-Xdomain:
%securityDomain%] %userSpecifiedArguments% [%target%|%target%]
[%otaurl%|-Xjam:transient=%otaurl%]
The SDK contains a uei.properties file in the root:
S60Device.bootclasspath: C:/S60/devices/S60_3rd_MIDP_SDK_FP1_3/lib/
hmidps60v31.jar
S60Device.screen.bitDepth: 12
S60Device.screen.height: 320
S60Device.screen.isColor: true
S60Device.screen.isTouch: false
S60Device.screen.width: 240
S60Emulator.bootclasspath: C:/S60/devices/S60_3rd_MIDP_SDK_FP1_3/lib/
hmidps60v31.jar
S60Emulator.screen.bitDepth: 12
S60Emulator.screen.height: 320
S60Emulator.screen.isColor: true
S60Emulator.screen.isTouch: false
S60Emulator.screen.width: 240
S60Emulator.security.domains: thirdparty
api.class.path: C:/S60/devices/S60_3rd_MIDP_SDK_FP1_3/lib/
hmidps60v31.jar
device.list: S60Emulator, S60Device
kvem.class.path: C:/S60/devices/S60_3rd_MIDP_SDK_FP1_3/bin/epoc32/
tools/ecmt/nei.jar
kvem.main: com.nokia.j2me.sei.NokiaEmulator
sdk.home: C:/S60/devices/S60_3rd_MIDP_SDK_FP1_3
As you can see, I already patched this with less success (the
security.domains entry)
Regards
----- Original Message
----- Original Message -----
From: Parag Chandra
To: eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] EclipseME 1.7.7 vs. S60 3rd emulator
Interesting. I've never worked with that particular emulator. On the
"Basic" tab of that same dialog, under Launch Command Template, do
you see anything like %securityDomain or -Xdomain in there? If so,
maybe you can just plug in a value like 'manufacturer' or 'maximum'.
Parag Chandra
Senior Software Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
404-439-5821
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of nei young
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:53 PM
To: eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] EclipseME 1.7.7 vs. S60 3rd emulator
Hi Parag,
thanks for your quick answer. I'm using S60 3rd FP 1. Your idea
sounds promissing, nevertheless under the properties tab there is
only entries for
bootclasspath
screen.bidepth
screen.height
screen.iscolor
screen.istouch
screen.width
and none of the entries is editable. Also - in the Wireless Toolkit
Emulator debug configuration this selection box is empty.
This is a snip off of the SDK releas note:
=
=
======================================================================
RELEASE NOTE FOR S60 3RD EDITION SDK FOR SYMBIAN OS, 13.02.2007
SUPPORTING FEATURE PACK 1, FOR MIDP
=
=
======================================================================
Regards
----- Original Message -----
From: Parag Chandra
To: eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] EclipseME 1.7.7 vs. S60 3rd emulator
Assuming this emulator is a standard UEI emulator, go to Window,
Preferences, J2ME, Device Management and double-click its entry in
the list. Under the properties tab, you should see a property named
"security.domains" that enumerates the supported trust levels. Now
go back to the Wireless Toolkit Emulator debug configuration for
your project and under the Emulation tab, enter in the desired
Security Domain. That should do it.
Parag Chandra
Senior Software Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
404-439-5821
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of nei young
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:59 AM
To: eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Eclipseme-users] EclipseME 1.7.7 vs. S60 3rd emulator
Hi group,
I'm using Eclipse 3.2 together with EclipseME 1.7.7 in order to
develop applications for Symbian S60. After tons of problems I'm now
having a situation, that I can edit, sign, run, debug and deploy
applications to my phone. The latter with a valid developer
certificate, because I'm using APIs, accessible for "trusted"
midlets only.
The major problem is: How to make the S60 3rd FP1 emulator know,
that my midlet is signed? Whenever I start a debug session, the
emulator prints out "Installing in untrusted mode".
I cannot make Eclise/EclipseME sign my _debuggee_ too (it works for
the package, not for the debuggee).
Can anybody give me a pointer, how to create a "trusted third party"
debuggee?
Kind regards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Eclipseme-users mailing list
Eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Eclipseme-users mailing list
Eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________
Eclipseme-users mailing list
Eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Eclipseme-users mailing list
Eclipseme-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
