Craig, On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 06:01 -0500, Setera Craig wrote: > I just posted a new blog entry listing lots of good reasons to make > the switch to MTJ from EclipseME. Please check out > http://eclipseme.org/blog/2008/10/28/why-switch-to-eclipse-mobile-tools-for-java/ >
Personally I see no reason not to switch to MTJ, and indeed have done so for myself and future training courses -- MTJ 0.9 is really EclipseME 1.9 so what reason is there not to change? Well actually I can think of one: MTJ has the potential of being seen as a Motorola project with all the consequences that a single-manufacturer-driven FOSS project suffers. I know that there is Nokia presence in the development team, also IBM, but it really looks like a Motorola project with Sybase input. Can I propose that the MTJ team actively seek out a bit more Nokia, SonyEricsson, Samsung, LG, Blackberry, etc. representation amongst the central development team? -- Russel. ==================================================== Dr Russel Winder Partner Concertant LLP t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203 41 Buckmaster Road, f: +44 8700 516 084 London SW11 1EN, UK. m: +44 7770 465 077
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Eclipseme-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
