On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:38:30 -0400 Matthew Mondor <mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net> wrote:
> I could test a newly built ECL, and confirm that I no longer get the > undefined SETF function error. I was also getting SIGSEGV/segfault > signals using INCF earlier but am now getting another error for INCF, > which might indicate a problem in my SETF expansion temporary/storage > variables. I'll have to take a deeper look at them when I can. I can also confirm that setting an expander to use a macro with a global and local-macrolet override also allows proper expansion as I initially expected, and that I could use it to inline accessors in some custom FFI code. An example function looping many times and using the setf expanders, takes ~0.248 seconds versus the one using WITH-INLINE-C-STRUCTURE-ACCESSORS now taking ~0.022 seconds. The former uses functions, while the later uses inline C, but has the obvious restriction of only being available in compiled code. The power of Common Lisp (and of ECL by extension) still continues to impress me. Thanks again, -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
