Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> It depends :-) I got as far as being able to link ECL into Emacs long > long time ago. No kidding!? > This involved quite some heavy hacking of the program, to remove its > garbage collector and replace it with the Boehm-Weiser one You mean Emacs's gc right? > , but it was more or less a two nights job (the gc stuff), plus some > additional work to link ECL in. The advantage of ECL is that you do > not need to replace all of emacs with the lisp from scratch. You may > let ECL manipulate emacs structures and then gradually replace > components. Yes. Then, I think step 2 would be to implement Emacs Lisp on top of ECL in order to preserve compatibility with existing stuff. Then we could gradually move the core and other libs to a true CL implementation. > But first it would be interesting to see whether there are good elisp > compilers that work with ECL. What do you mean? -- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
