>> At that point, I'm interested in starting to pitch XCVB >> to adventurous Lisp hackers. Maybe even as a way to build ECL itself? >> For the latter, I might first have to port XCVB so it runs on ECL. > > I do not understand why ECL would need XCVB to build itself? Right now it is > using just one makefile to build the C library and one compilation file that > builds all modules sequentially -- the bootstrap order is so delicate that > separate files can almost never be compiled individually. > "Need" is a big word. I was hoping that with XCVB, some modules might be compiled in parallel, and/or more incrementally. No matter.
In any case, thanks for your support. NB: I have made a few changes to the upstream asdf and asdf-ecl in 2.015.4, 2.014.7, 2.014.2, 2.012.6, 2.012.5, in addition to many non-ECL specific fixes. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Austrian economics is the second law of thermodynamics to every other economist's perpetual motion machines. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
