On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:15:54 +0200 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The SI package is not going to be empty. The functions in SI do exist and > might be used, but are not intended for public use -- they are not stable in > the sense of future-proof. SBCL also has internal packages and their output > is shown in APROPOS. Would you vote for hiding those results? I was not aware that EXT was considered a stable interface wheareas SI wasn't, I thought SI was only a historical alias for EXT, and that using either was at one's own risk. I think that it's fine for both to be shown, then. Thanks for the explanation, -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas, optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
