Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Philipp Marek <phil...@marek.priv.at> wrote: > > My reasoning is that most people don't need cryptographically secure [1] > random numbers; if they need some, they can (and for portability _should_) > always initialize the state themselves. > > 4 bytes for initializing MT seems too little to me. But is it really > so costly what ECL is currently doing? The implementation I have needs 56 longs, 224 octets. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas, optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
