On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:33:11 +0200 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The code as it appears in the tree is considered feature complete. This > means I do not want to introduce any further properties or arguments to the > functions in the MP package and now the priority is shared among these > goals: Although we also communicated off-list, I wanted to confirm on-list that I think great progress was made. There appears to be potential issues if using process-kill, but the POSIX API itself has to account for cancellation points in its cancel interface... If I configure the HTTPd to use a pool of threads that doesn't scale down, it's more stable than the POSIX-based ECL locks ever were, including my simplified implementation (which also had other issues related to interrupts). There are various possible solutions to avoid process-kill, including a suggestion from Juan, which I intend to eventually try, such that the pool could scale down safely. Thanks, -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
