On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodono...@yandex.ru>wrote:

> So maybe the question is, whether it is possible to enforce bytecode
> compiler even
> if lisp-to-c compiler is abalable
>

(c:install-bytecodes-compiler) replaces all Common Lisp functions with the
bytecode version one -- no part of ECL will / should complain about that.
To switch back you will be able to use the other function
(c:install-c-compiler)

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de FĂ­sica Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list

Reply via email to