On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 06:55:15PM +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: >I would go as far as to argue that what you demand is impossible. The following >program apparently uses only two functions, but it has access to the whole >Common Lisp library
The tree shakers usually have some type of configuration that allows the developer to specify what is needed (since that isn't determinable from the code directly). They usually have various options, from eliminating symbol names entirely, to giving a list of symbols from common-lisp that the application expects to need, to pulling in all of common-lisp. They're usually a good bit of work to implement, and kind of a major feature of the implementations that have them. David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
