On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:16:20 +1000 David Creelman <creelman.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for getting ECL to the point it's at. It seems to be working quite well > now and is a quite good option on a small memory machine (256Mb). SBCL won't > work because it needs a whole lot of memory and CLISP seems to have several > problems with libs. It's probable that you could configure SBCL to use a smaller heap (it's also the case with ECL, which probably uses a smaller default). There is an issue with garbage-collected languages in general in that if the heap is too small the collector must run very often, which impacts performance. I think that the defaults ECL uses are general purpose enough, and I didn't have to tweak them so far. -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
