On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:02:41 -0700
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Matthew Mondor 
> <mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net>wrote:
> 
> >
> > I believe that boehm-gc permits to temporarily disable the GC for
> > critical sections?
> >
> > By a quick look, it seems that ECL does not export such facility right
> > now, but would it be nonsense to eventually allow this for use by rare
> > but specific code sections which should ideally execute as predictably
> > as possible?
> 
> 
> Hi Matthew, could you please file a support request with this? It can be
> done, but the interface is deprecated and now there is instead a wrapper
> function with a callback that supposedly is called with locks on and no GC.
> I would have to investigate it.

Done: http://sourceforge.net/p/ecls/feature-requests/16/

I wasn't sure what to set for priority (if it's in ascending or
descending order) so I left the default (1), but the request is low
priority.

Thanks,
-- 
Matt

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list

Reply via email to