On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:48:09 -0400 Matthew Mondor <mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net> wrote:
> Ilya, I'm not sure if you want this for debugging or to implement lazy > function creation. If for the latter, I would suggest using a custom > protocol to call those special functions which should be automatically > instanciated. This would be portable and could be altered for your > needs... i.e. a funcall-like layer. > > If it's for debugging, with a high enough debug level we can see in the > stack trace that TEST was the culprit attempting to call WOJOWEJ. It > would thus also be possible to modify TEST to add explicit checks or > logging. Is there a reason why is this not enough for your needs? It also occurred to me that for generic functions without an applicable method, the corresponding no-applicable-method method, if it exists, will be called and passed the arguments. -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
