On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:17:28 +0200 Peter Enerccio <enerc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure. memory can be read only, but that has more to do with OS, CPU > registers and segmentation, really. And it only applies to cstrings and > constant numbers, really. You cant mark class/struct in ro memory, because > even though class/struct is read only, fields will not be. And especially > in c++ you cant because you will need to write the class in at > initialization anyways. Ultimately though, pointers are just numbers, so > casts work precisely. Having read-only data is one of the possible implications, not the only one; for instance a compiler might not need to be a full-program optimizer to infer the absence of some side effects in some circumstances... But I admit again that in general it's still more useful for humans. -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
