Peter Enerccio <enerc...@gmail.com> writes: > I dont understand why do you need to provide your binary o file with > LGPL at all. What is the merit of it, from the point of creator of > library?
The GPL and derived licenses ARE NOT to the benefit of the creator of the code! They are to the benefit of the USERS of the code. On the other hand, MIT/BSD etc, are indeed to the benefit of the creator and other programmers who link with it. Now of course, one could ask whether in the whole world, there is even a single one _user_ who ever took advantage of the freedoms provided to them by the GPL licenses. It seems like only programmers are having those considerations. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. You know you've been lisping too long when you see a recent picture of George Lucas and think "Wait, I thought John McCarthy was dead!" -- Dalek_Baldwin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
