On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Andy Hefner <ahef...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This sounds like a pair of features I've desired for a long time. Will >> this allow using arbitrary C types which lisp doesn't necessarily >> understand, such as a struct defined by some library header, for the >> sake of later referring to them within inline C? > > > Unfortunately not. Doing that would involve ECL parsing headers and > understanding type definitions.
I don't think we're thinking the same thing. I don't want to do anything with the variable from Lisp, I simply want it defined in a scope that it such that the variable will continue to exist and be visible within other inline C blocks, and given a name that won't clash with variables generated by the ECL compiler. I suppose it is a different feature than what you described, since it need not correspond to a lisp variable at all. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
