> > Yes! Lets promote lesbianism on this list! > > Bertina > > It's very interesting idea. I have once talked with an evolutionary >biologist who is also a feminist about this idea. According to her, this >does not work very well because female needs male to have a reproduction. >If a lesbian does not want a child that's fine. Her gene will never goes >to next generation. So she is out of evolutionary process. But if she >want a offspring, she has to find a sperm carrier (male) unless she is the >Virgin Marry. The question is where she gets a sperm which is advantageous >to her evolutionary success? A good sperm carrier would choose may choose >female who is cooperative or subordiant to him for his mate. A good sperm >will be a scarce resource. The consequence is a competion among females. > According to the evolutionary biologist, the competition between females is >more deadly than that of males. In conclusion, increase of lesbianism does >not work than you think from the perspective of evolutionary biology. > Increase of lesbianism is fine if there is also an increase of gay. Shortage >of avairable female also means increase of competition among sperm carriers or >increase of forceful reproductive behavior of sperm carrier to female, which is >called rape in human term.... > Toshihide This is all well and good if we are to accept what the biologists say about how we choose mates. Who are these biologists? Why should we accept them? Why do womyn have different ideas to each other as to who is most attractive? Why would it matter if there were a surplus of guys if a lot of womyn became lesbians? Have you (Toshihide) ever heard about artificial insemination? Some lesbian couples I know have children, where one womyn inserted the donated sperm into the other womyn. Lesbians do not have to be childless. Is a womyns primary function childbirth? Toshihide's script appears to indicate this, as do many people. Why is men's function not thought of as a sperm provider in the same way as womyn's function as a birther? Hoping these questions provoke thought. Respectfully, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Interesting: Your people glorified organised violence for 40 centuries, but you imprison those who employ it privately." Mr Spock. Star Trek 'Dagger of the Mind'
