Kia ora e te whanau

I have been asked to give a talk at Mana wahine seminar here at 
Lincoln University, here are snippets of notes (I haven't put 
together much at the moment).  I believe Mana wahine and 
Pakeha (non-Maori/European) feminism to have the same inherent goals 
(e.g. empowerment of wahine/women, etc.) but are still `poles apart' 
because of their different political and cultural 
identities/histories.  I don't to know much about feminism so I hope 
that some of you can help me out here, and correct me if I make too 
many incorrect assumptions.  
**********************************************************************
A number of factors influence Maori wahine/women's development -  
iwi/tribal affiliation, sexual preference, knowledge of traditional Maori 
tikanga (that is, rules, protocols, etc.), knowledge of te 
reo/language, rural or urban location, identification on the 
political spectrum from radical to traditional, place in the 
whanau/extended family, the level of formal schooling and educational 
attainments to name but a few (Irwin, 1990: 2-3).

Beyond these, however, and our identities as Maori women are our 
gendered positions in both the Maori and Pakeha (non-Maori) worlds.  
As a traditionalist I accept my gendered position in te 
kotahitanga/the unity which gives me the powerful spirituality of 
mana wahine which symbolises the status, power and authority handed 
down to me along my matrilineal line of descent from 
Papatuanuku/mother earth.  My status when I am in the Maori world (as 
opposed to the Pakeha world in which I live in Lincoln) was based on 
the traditional mores of iwi where my role as wahine is clearly 
defined as complementary but different to those of tane/men.  My 
status of wahine is parallel to the status of my brother.

Te Whakamana wahine validates the knowledge of Maori women and 
enables that knowledge to be reproduced or passed on to younger 
women.  Many Maori women, myself included, believe that the natural 
mana possessed by wahine has been robbed by colonisation, by the way 
history has been defined and by the impact of social and economic 
change on Maori women.  Te kotahitanga has been unbalanced.  
Colonisation helped to upset this balance by promoting the 
activities and perspectives of knowledge held by Maori tane at he 
expense of Maori wahine. 

Te Whakamana wahine is about recovering and reclaiming our sacred 
knowledges and our worldviews.  Mana wahine is about reclaiming 
Papatuanuku/earth mother and Ranginuietunei/sky father.  It is a 
continuous struggle for autonomy for Maori wahine and it a continuous 
struggle to reclaim our matriarchy.  

Te Whakamana wahine also relates to the provision of space where the 
activities of wahine can be carried out autonomously without 
distractions.  In the past we had our own Whare/houses, in these 
places, wahine were in control and could determine all aspects of 
work.  The whole sphere of the marae/sacred meeting places was 
controlled by wahine (the battlegrounds belonged to the tane).  It 
was the wahine who undertook to control all aspects of marae protocol 
from beginning to end.  The decline and devaluation of the control of 
wahine on the sacred marae, and the displacement of their position 
compared to tane within their own society, began with Christian 
morality and Victorian values of the early missionaries.  The roles 
of Maori wahine and our sexuality was re-interpreted according to 
Pakeha christian patriarchy.

In the decades that followed, Maori wahine were often ostracised when 
they tried to participate in iwi/tribal business at decision-making 
levels because of the false premise that tane along had "speaking 
rights" (could whaikorero) in Maori society.  Some feminists (Maori 
and Pakeha) argued for wahine to have the right to whaikorero (in 
fact many do but many choose not to) because denial of "speaking 
rights" impled denial of leadership potential.  They assumed that 
because Maori wahine did not whaikorero on the marae, this was 
somehow sexist and had to be changed.  In making these assumptions, 
however, they used the male whaikorero as the norm against which our 
behaviour as wahine was being judged.  In other words, what we did 
didn't count, and as a consequence the karanga, the waiata, and the 
tangi, our "speaking rights", were invalidated.  These very important 
functions were not considered to be as privileged or prestigious as 
those duties performed exclusively (in most cases) by tane/men. 

The new awakening and interest in tikanga Maori, has illuminated some 
sad (but expected) aspects of our changing culture.  Modernised 
Maori cultural practices are emerging now which coincidently serve 
the interests of Pakeha men whilst disempowering Maori wahine.  Male 
outsiders, by virtue of their gender, are increasingly given 
exclusive participatory rights on the marae, in ways which exclude 
Maori wahine.  One of these rights, is the freedom to whaikorero 
("speaking rights") which I spoke about above.  Although an inherited 
male-right, if tane wish to give up their right to speak on the 
marae, I believe it should be it be offered to the many contemporary 
wahine who wish to have this right.  

To offer this right to outsiders, this shows Maori wahine that our 
culture can and is being changed to accomodate the needs of men and 
the links they have with each other.  The role and status of wahine 
remains unchanged, immobile and inflexible, and often defined by tane 
(in reality they are the roles we have inherited but many tane still 
try to define them for us).  

I get particularly bad-tempered when a tane (often a young tane) 
tries to define my role for me, this shows a lack of respect.  I 
would never dare try to define the role of the tane on the 
marae (I'm not that bloody ignorant).  Many tane even have the 
audacity to define our menstruations, trying to prohibit us from 
doing things on the basis of their own ignorance.  In our world 
menstruating wahine are sacred during which time, the menstruating 
wahine was not allowed (by kuia/elderly wahine) to partake in many of 
the activities normally undertaken by wahine.  The rationale, for a 
society in which menstrual protection was not absolutely reliable, 
made clear sense.  Because many of the tasks performed by wahine 
demands a squatting position, often over the actual work, to 
accidently stain some weaving work or other would damage it 
irreparably.  It would be undeniably shameful if she was to spoil 
the food that she is gathering or cooking.  The risk was simply 
not worth it.  Menstruating wahine were just allowed to languish in 
exquisite laziness until it was over.  Ignorant tane have 
turned this natural part of our existence into some that is 
bad.  All discharge from the womb of a wahine, however, reinforced her 
connection to Papatuanuku, origin of all things.

In the sense, that te Whakamana wahine, strives for autonomy for Maori 
wahine and the acknowledgement of the mana of wahine, and 
criticises what patriarchy has done to the mana of wahine, here it 
embraces the goals of Pakeha feminism.  For me, however, Pakeha 
feminists have tended to place gender as a central focus of analysis. 
I think that the issue of ethnicity/culture and the issue of class (a 
feature of contemporary life) also needs to be woven more centrally 
into the analysis.  Colonisation was legitimated by ideologies that 
located Maori people as `inferior' and Maori wahine as `doubly 
inferior' because of being Maori and being female.  Mana wahine works 
towards critiquing ways in which Maori wahine have been defined 
historically, to unveil the essence of Mana wahine beneath the 
colonial shroud under which we have been subsumed.  To regain control 
over our images and the image of our mother Papatuanuku.
********************************************************************

It would be great, if anyone can offer some other thoughts on the 
integration of Pakeha feminism and non-Pakeha traditional knowledge.

Naku na ano

Nellie:)
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 29 11:34:56 1995
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Golden)
Subject: press statement on NYC Aug. 3 demo for Mumia (fwd)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 10:35:51 PDT

Forwarded message:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 28 14:47:53 1995
> Date:         Fri, 28 Jul 1995 17:22:13 -0400
> Reply-To: Progressive News & Views List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: Progressive News & Views List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: PNEWS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:      press statement on NYC Aug. 3 demo for Mumia
> 
> [*****PNEWS CONFERENCES****]
> From: NY Spartacist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: new press statement on NYC Aug. 3 demo for Mumia
> 
> August 3 Demonstration Demands: Stop the Execution of Mumia Abu-
> Jamal! Abolish the Racist Death Penalty!
> 
>      Join Local 1199, Social Service Employees Union Local 371,
> the Black Veterans for Social Justice and many others in a mass
> labor/black mobilization to stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal
> and to abolish the racist death penalty.  Initiated by the
> Partisan Defense Committee, the demonstration will be held
> Thursday, August 3, at 4:00 p.m. in Foley Square, across from the
> U.S. Federal Courthouse at 40 Centre Street in Manhattan.
>      We are in a race against time--August 17 is set as the
> execution date for this renowned black journalist and champion of
> the oppressed, who is innocent yet sentenced to die for his
> political activities and beliefs.  The courts and cops are intent
> on railroading Mumia to death.  There must be thousands of trade-
> unionists, along with all fighters against the racist injustice
> system, at the protest on August 3 to say: Mumia Abu-Jamal must
> not die!
>      For more information, and to get involved in this critical
> campaign, call the P.D.C. at (212) 406-4252.
> 
> 
> 
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>              ***** PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS ******
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> PNEWS CONFERENCES  provide "radical" alternative views with an
>   emphasis on justice, humanitarian positions, protests,
>   boycott alerts, activism information, etc.
>                        ****************
>        To subscribe, send request to:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- and state in in message:
> "SUBSCRIBE PNEWS-L <Your full name>
>    @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> 

Reply via email to