The New York Times, September 10, 1995
   Week in Review, pp. 1, 3.


   The Second Sex in the Third World

      [Photo] Among the workers digging a system of canals in
      India are women whose job is to carry off the last bits
      of earth.

   By Barbara Crossette


   Down a dusty back lane on the ragged edge of the old
   Pakistani city of Rawalpindi, some women met a few years
   ago to plan a feminist revolutlon. It involved lipsticks
   and bras -- but not to jettison the former or burn the
   latter. On the contrary. The women hoped to stock cosmetics
   and lingerie to be sold door to door in conservative
   Islamic neighborhoods where only the men could be out to
   shop, and their wives and daughters could not choose even
   their most intimate attire. The marketing plan promised two
   freedoms: some independent income for poor women, and a
   little choice in life for others.

   Fruit Stalls

   In Asia, Africa and Latin America, such small initiatives
   in economic development -- a milk-producing goat for a
   village woman in Bangladesh, a wooden stall for a fruit
   grower in South India, farm tools for an African, a sewing
   machine in Trinidad -- have become hallmarks of a new
   women's movement that differs markedly in scale, style and
   substance from the traditional feminism of the industrial
   West.

   While women in the richer nations now known as "the North,"
   bicker over history and theory and the question of whether
   it is demeaning even to talk about women's rights separate
   from human rights, women of "the South," in what was once
   called the third world, are organizing in phenomenal
   numbers for pragmatic goals: access to capital, the right
   of inheritance, basic education for girls, a voice in the
   political establishment and medical systems that let them
   make choices, especially in reproductive health.

   The proliferation of homegrown projects in developing
   countries has moved both the focus and momentum of the
   women's movement worldwide away from the developed world,
   where Western-style feminists have become increasingly
   irrelevant, and toward the developing world. Now feminists
   from rich nations are more likely to be supporters of the
   global women's movement, not its leaders. Indeed, the women
   who flocked to the Fourth World Conference on Women in
   Beijing from the developing world dismissed as nonsense the
   criticisms of those who say that the agenda of the meeting
   was created by and for Western feminists.

   As women around the world prepared for the conference, for
   instance, many agreed that the preparatory meetings over
   the last year in Africa were the liveliest and most
   intense. When computers crashed at the final round of
   meetings in Dakar, Senegal, African women, always good
   storytellers, recreated their agenda in their heads
   overnight and hand-wrote their document. "When the energy
   goes, we provide our own," said Gertrude Mongella, a
   Tanzanian who is Secretary-General of the Beijing women's
   conference.

   Rounaq Jahan, a Bangladeshi political scientist and the
   author of "The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in
   Development," said Asian women agree that much of the
   exhilaration left in feminism is in the developing world.

   "While the feminist movement seems to have peaked in the
   North by the 1970's," she said, "in many countries of the
   South it is still young and vibrant."

   Perhaps this is because in the developing world, the
   women's movement is much more a matter of life and death.

   Outside a small clinic on the fringe of a slum in Dhaka,
   the capital of Bangladesh, mothers and children huddling
   for hours in an open-air waiting room demonstrated the
   drawing power and the importance of small women's
   organizations. At this clinic, run by the Independent
   Bangladesh Women ' s Health Coalition, a bone-thin,
   seriously anemic woman was slouched on the edge of an
   examining table waiting for contraceptives. A sympathetic
   female doctor told her that delaying the birth of another
   child was not enough, if she did not accept diet
   supplements and look after her health, mental and physical,
   she would die.

   In such small institutions, it is not only women's bodies
   that matter. Their vocations, habits, needs and desires are
   treated as important. And the women are encouraged to think
   beyond their homes. The Dhaka clinic that was mobbed with
   women and children one day was almost empty on another
   because both staff and patients had volunteered as
   neighborhood election observers.

   In several cities in India, women's organizations are
   focused on the issue of pervasive, often fatal domestic
   violence. This summer, for instance, a well known
   politician was accused of murdering his wife and having her
   body stuffed into a restaurant's tandoor oven, prompting
   demonstrations of outraged women. And their involvement
   doesn't stop with protest. Women often find themselves
   wading into police and court procedures, civil rights law
   and media work. Knowing that for many women there is no
   economic alternative but to remain in abusive homes,
   women's groups are also trying to promote self-help
   vocational projects and low-cost housing for the victims of
   domestic violence.

   In the last few years, a bold new idea has caught on --
   that women are the key to development. As a result, the
   women's movements in developing countries have picked up
   powerful allies from independent women's groups in Europe
   and the United States, from government aid agencies and
   from the World Bank. The thinking now is that the poorest
   nations will never grow out of poverty unless women become
   a more active part of civil society. Without this, a
   country can forget population control, the eradication of
   epidemic diseases and even the conservation of its natural
   resources.

   "No country can develop if half its human resources are
   devalued or repressed," Madeleine K. Albright, the chief
   American representative at the United Nations told an
   audience in Beijing.

   The World Bank, the primary lender to poor nations and an
   organization that has had plenty of opportunities to see
   why traditional aid does not always work, is busily
   planning new loans for women. Bank officials say that in
   the last decade, the percentage of the institution's
   portfolio devoted to what they call "gender concerns" has
   risen from 10 percent to more than a third. Of the $3.5
   billion set aside for improving the status of women, the
   Bank says, $200 million is going into a new micro-credit
   program to provide tiny loans to women without collateral.

   Poor women are surprisingly good investments everywhere,
   says Nancy Barry, the president of Women's World Banking,
   a 16-year-old nonprofit institution with affiliates in 40
   developing countries. Bangladesh's Grameen Bank, now the
   model for small-scale credit, lent women S400 million in
   1994 -- including some loans as small as $1 -- and 97
   percent of them were paid back.

   "Women don't need charity, they need access," Ms. Barry
   said. And once they have it, they willingly trade
   information across national lines. Women in one country
   find out through personal networks and electronic
   communication which econpmic projects work in another
   country, and then they copy them. "What works in Uganqa
   will influence the Dominican Republic," Ms. Barry said.

   No Grandiose Schemes

   All around the world, women are practical and realistic in
   their requests, rarely proposing grandiose schemes. In the
   southern Indian state of Karnataka, a leading politician
   said: "If you ask the village people what they want, they
   wan't ask for a medical college. They want bee hives or
   market stalls or a pump."

   "Women of Africa know what they want," Mrs. Mongella said
   in interview. "We don't need a prescription. We just need
   support to implement what we want to do." In African
   families, she said, there is a feeling that the policies
   dictated by international institutions have not so much
   trickled down as fallen on their heads. Something that
   looks good as a national policy can be devastating for a
   village.

   An unexpected reversal has now begun. The vitality and
   immediacy of the women's movement in the southern half of
   the world is now catching on in the northern half.
   Americans working in inner-city organizations and rural
   self-help projects in poor regions of the United States are
   beginning to see how much work can be done with very little
   money. They are studying successful immunization programs
   and self-help projects jump-started by small loans for
   would-be businesswomen.

   American women are also learning how much farther the women
   in poor nations still have to go, said Barbara Arnwine, the
   executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil
   Rights Under Law. "American women do not realize that our
   sisters throughout the world do not have the kinds of
   enforceable rights that we have, that they do not have the
   ability to go to court and to say, 'I have been denied-a
   job,' " Ms. Arnwine said. "They do not have the right to
   say, 'I have been denied housing because I have children.'
   We hear stories of women being driven out of business in
   India, in Africa. Many women In the world, even in family
   courts, don't have the rights of men in custody cases."

   What women of the developing world do share with women in
   developed nations, though, is a revulsion against violence,
   said Ms. Mongella. Civil wars in Africa, Asia and also in
   the Balkans have made millions of women refugees or victims
   of genocide and rape. "What benefit does the gun hold for
   the women," asked Ms. Mongella. No woman needs a gun. But
   give her a hoe or a water pump "and she will make a
   change."

   [End]






Reply via email to