This is truly an exciting time in the history of human relations.  
        Many authors, apparently "on the same wavelength," are writing 
        about dramatic changes in how we view things in our culture.  I'm 
        particularly impressed in Riane Eisler's tying together of myriad 
        issues (gender relations, race relations, class relations, peace 
        and war, child rearing, worker empowerment, environmental 
        protection, sexual and other freedoms, etc.) in a common thread: 
        moving from dominator to partnership models of running things.

        Dig this:


        excerpts from "Sacred Pleasure," 1995, by Riane Eisler

          "Until recently, the general assumption has been that human 
        society never was, and by implication never can be, anything except 
        male dominated and warlike -- or that if there was anything 
        different in our prehistory, it was so primitive as to be unworthy 
        of much attention."  [But] "new archeological discoveries, coupled 
        with reinterpretations of older excavations, support views that 
        there were in our prehistory more peaceful societies.  In extensive 
        excavations of early European Neolithic settlements that had 
        regular trade and other contact with one another, there are few 
        signs of destruction through warfare or of fortifications.  
        Moreover, there is in the rich art of the Neolithic (to us) 
        remarkable lack of scenes of men killing each other in 'heroic' 
        battles" [or] "of men raping women.
          "A second finding is that there were not in these societies the 
        massive inequities we have been taught are characteristic of all 
        ancient civilizations.  The comparative size of houses, the nature 
        of their contents, and the funerary gifts in graves point to a more 
        egalitarian social structure."
          "A third basic aspect of these first cradles of Western 
        civilization is that there is no evidence that women were 
        subordinate to men.  There are indications that women specialized 
        in some of the more important crafts of their time: pottery, 
        weaving, and the creation of ritual artifacts and art.  
        Furthermore, from art, burial gifts, and temple models, there is 
        evidence that women were priestesses holding important religious 
        positions."
          [But in artifacts from about 6000 years ago] "'...archeologists 
        perceive a structural reorganization of society across much of 
        southeastern Europe.'  '...evidence for this comes from the 
        abandonment of the tell sites which had flourished for several 
        millennia; the displacement of previous cultures in almost every 
        direction except eastward; movement to marginal locations, such as 
        islands and caves or easily fortified hilltop sites such as 
        Cernavoda I; and a general reduction in the major Neolithic 
        technologies of both fine ceramic manufacture and copper 
        metallurgy.'  '...this abandonment and movement, often propelling 
        neighboring cultures into one another, operated against a 
        background not only of somewhat elusive traces of hybridization 
        with the steppe cultures such as the Usatavo and Cernavoda I, but 
        also with continuous incursions of mobile pastoralists.'"
          "There is...consensus among most Indo-Europeanists that...during 
        the period from approximately 4500 to 2500 B.C.E.... 
        proto-Indo-Europeans left Eurasia in wave after wave of migration, 
        to bring both their alien languages and their alien ways of 
        structuring social and sexual relations into Europe."  "...the 
        appearance of the Indo-European Kurgans in prehistoric Europe marks 
        the beginning of the end of a more partnership-oriented 
        civilization."  "...gradually cultures where women (and 'feminine' 
        values) had not been subordinated or despised were either 
        destroyed, conquered, or themselves began to become societies where 
        'heroic' warfare and the rule by force and fear of a small male 
        elite (along with gods of war and thunder) became the norm."
          "...harsh environmental changes were the switch that set off a 
        complex sequence of events -- famine, social chaos, land 
        abandonment, and mass migration..."


        excerpts from "Sacred Pleasure" (Riane Eisler), continued

          [James DeMeo has found] "a correlation in preindustrial tribal 
        societies between a harsh environment, the rigid social and sexual 
        subordination of women, the equation of masculinity with toughness 
        and warlikeness, and the repression and/or distortion of sexual 
        pleasure..."  "...this kind of social organization itself seems to 
        have originated in times of harsh climatic changes."  "...times 
        when droughts reduced areas that were once green semiforested 
        savannahs to arid steppes and/or deserts."  "...it was from these 
        areas, which now could support only nomadic grazing rather than 
        farming (and during acute droughts, not even that), that wave after 
        wave of nomadic pastoral migrations and invasions ensued."
          "DeMeo...proposes that rather than being merely random or 
        accidental, the making of patrist or dominator social institutions 
        was the outcome of traumatic experiences and practices that evolved 
        during severe climatic and environmental changes."  "...and...once 
        established, these patterns of social and sexual organization were 
        exported into more fertile regions, where this type of social and 
        sexual organization was now perpetuated through the 
        institutionalization of trauma (for example, through traumatic 
        child-rearing practices that effectively inhibit respiration, 
        emotional expression, and pleasure-directed impulses)."  "...these 
        repressive social institutions...to varying degrees still today 
        block not only full physiological and emotional expression but 
        sexual pleasure and full sexual satisfaction.  And...the 
        institutionalized distortion of human sexuality -- particularly 
        severe and cruel controls over female sexuality -- have been 
        primary mechanisms for the maintenance of dominator (or...patrist) 
        societies."
          "During the second half of the twentieth century, people began to 
        talk of a revolution in consciousness..."  "...there was a 
        resurgence of feminism, as women all over the world challenged 
        stereotypical gender roles and relations, and with this, the 
        five-thousand-year entrenchment of male dominance."  "Actually 
        these changes in consciousness...began in the West as far back as 
        the Renaissance and the end of the Middle Ages.  But they were 
        vastly accelerated during the later stages of the Industrial 
        Revolution, which brought massive technological and economic 
        changes that in turn forced major changes not only in work habits 
        but in habits of thinking and living.  Such fundamental changes in 
        turn required much social restructuring, as well as a reevaluation 
        of many long-established 'truths.'  In the process, thanks in large 
        part to the much maligned Enlightenment, many things that had until 
        then been thought inevitable -- slavery, the divine right of kings 
        to rule, the idea that woman's sexuality poses a threat to man's 
        moral and spiritual well-being -- began to be reexamined and 
        rejected.
          "In short, the major technological, economic, and social 
        upheavals that marked the onset of the modern era about three 
        hundred years ago opened the door for a ground swell of partnership 
        resurgence, more powerful than before.  For if from the new 
        perspective of CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION THEORY we take a fresh look 
        at modern Western history, we see that underneath its complex 
        currents and crosscurrents lies the struggle between a mounting 
        partnership thrust and an equally fierce dominator resistance.  And 
        we also see that this struggle is not just over political and 
        economic relations; it is, and all along has been, over sexual, 
        gender, and family relations -- with the common thread being the 
        challenge to a system based on rankings ultimately backed by force 
        and the fear of pain."
          "...the real progress can only come as people begin to awaken 
        from the 'social trance'..."

Reply via email to