The New York Times, August 30, 1995, p. A17.


   Australia Goes Pacific [Foreign Affairs column]

      A 'wok' society flavored with environmentalism.

   By Thomas L. Friedman
 

   Canberra, Australia. Sometimes a government has to totally
   misread the mood of its own people to fully appreciate
   where the soul of the nation is on an issue. That was
   certainly the case here when, after the French announced
   plans for seven nuclear tests in the South Pacific, the
   Australian Foreign Minister said the decision was
   "unfortunate" but could have been worse.

   The Australian public didn't think so, and it went on a
   spontaneous rampage against all things French. The Asian
   Wall Street Journal even reported that Australian
   prostitutes were charging their French customers double
   (Sacre bleu!). Since then, the Australian Government has
   been scrambling to get ahead of the public bandwagon.
   What's funny is that it was the Australian Government that
   had built the bandwagon.

   You see, the Australian public reaction against the French
   nuclear test is not just a sign of the popularity of
   environmentalism here. It is also a sign of how successful
   Australian governments have been in reshaping this
   country's identity -- from white, English-speaking and
   Anglo-Saxon to multiracial, multilingual and Asian-Pacific.

   Think about this: In the 1950's the British tested nuclear
   weapons, *above ground*, in Australia's desert. At the
   time, there was not a peep of protest here. Since
   Australians thought of themselves as British subjects, they
   didn't even consider their own backyard their real
   backyard. They thought their real backyard was back in
   England. Today the French are testing their nuclear weapons
   at the Mururoa Atoll, which is 4,000 miles from Australia
   in the South Pacific. But because Australians now think of
   themselves as a Pacific nation, they are protesting the
   French testing as though it were being conducted under the
   Sydney Opera House.

   Ever since Australia ended its whites-only immigration
   policies in 1966, the country has been taking on an
   Asian-Pacific identity, but particularly under the current
   Prime Minister, Paul Keating, who has passionately promoted
   multiculturalism. There are now 140 different ethnic groups
   here, speaking 90 different languages, and of the 85,000
   new immigrants each year the vast majority are from Vietnam
   and China. The popular Vietnamese family name Nguyen is the
   sixth-most-common name in the Melbourne phone book day.
   Goodbye Crocodile Dundee, hello Bruce Lee.

   No wonder Mr. Keating refers to Australia not as a melting
   pot but as Asia's great "wok" society, into which all sorts
   of ethnic groups are being diced and stir-fried for a new
   Asian-Pacific mix. Go to a pub along the Sydney harbor, and
   you are more likely to be served Indonesian satays, or
   fettuccine with Thai sauce, than steak and kidney pie.

   Australia's increasing Asian-Pacific identity reinforces,
   and is reinforced by, its desire to do more business in
   Asia. Eighty percent of Australia's trade today is with
   Asia; 30 years ago it was 20 percent. American Express just
   decided to put its new credit card service center for all
   of Asia in Sydney. Amex chose Australia over other
   countries in part because it offered a pool of employees
   who could speak English and either Korean, Japanese,
   Cantonese, Mandarin, Bahasa Indonesian, Malay, Vietnamese
   or Hindi. All Australian high school students today are
   required to study either Chinese, Korean, Japanese or
   Indonesian as a second language.

   All of this adds to the desire here to break Australia's
   last ties with the Queen of England, who is still,
   formally, Australia's head of state. Mr. Keating, who has
   declared that "We are not a political or cultural appendage
   to another country's past," wants Australia to elect its
   own president for its centennial in 2001.

   Which gets us back to Australia's opposition to the French
   tests. Historically, nations have tended to define their
   political identity as something separate from their
   environment and ecosystem. But for more than a decade now
   the Australian Government has been imbuing its people with
   a sense of pride in where they live, and building a new
   political and economic identity out of that.

   "Well," said an Australian environmentalist, Paul Gilding,
   "the people have been listening, and that's why they are
   telling the French to stay away. This may be the start of
   a global trend; Australia's people are defining and
   expressing their political identity through a commitment to
   protect the environment. Now we just have to get that to
   happen in the rest of the world."

   [End]






Reply via email to