I strongly question some of these so-called "facts" from 'Diet for a New American'. Especially this one: > o Amount of trees spared per year by each individual who switches to a pure > vegetarian diet: 1 acre This whole argument of the meat eaters versus the vegetarians who disdain the meat eaters is reminiscent of the feminist argument between the mothers who stayed home to raise their children versus the working mothers (I mean working for a salary outside of the home). Neither one is better than the other. Mothers who have stayed home to raise their children have raised just as many maladjusted, gang-seeking, drug-stupored, brain-dead teenage hoodlums as have the mothers who took their kids to day-care and worked outside the home. The same thing can be said for each group who raised well-adjusted kids who grew up to be responsible members of society. I don't want to see the environment destroyed even though I happen to be a meat eater and fully intend to remain one. You vegetarians out there should take off your rose-colored glasses which make you think you are better than the rest of us and go after the damn Republicans who are catering to corporate America and gutting every environmental law they possibly can. If Newt and his gang of Republican terrorists get their way, we will all be drinking dirty water. There are other very important issues at risk in this world than whether the vegetarians are better and more responsible citizens than the beef eaters. So let's find another subject to claim superiority about and leave the meat eaters alone. Darla
Re: Eating Meat
Darla E Straka, Illustrator (Phy Sci), Albuquerque, NM Thu, 11 Jan 1996 07:58:37 -0700
- Re: Eating Meat Arie Zonshine
- Darla E Straka, Illustrator (Phy Sci), Albuquerque, NM
