This definition assumes that the matriarichial cultures had no such thing as eco-fems, because of lack of the PC. I feel tha no definition of eco-fems need be based on the existance of men...or their doominance. I LIKE that typo - DOOMinance4. On Thu, 11 Jan 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ecofeminism is, in my understanding, 3 assumptions and one conclusion: > > 1. Patriarchal cultures naturalize women. > 2. PCs feminize nature. > 3. 1 & 2 reinforce and facilitate the objectification of both. > > Thus, women occupy particularly useful positions for interrogating and > interrupting environmental degradations. > > Of course, it's more complex than any definition can encapsule. Categories > such as "nature" and "women," and adjectives like "patriarchal" require > constant questioning themselves. But this is where I start explaining something > as odd as "ecofeminism" to people who say, "eco-what?" > > Sara > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 20 07:17:05 1996 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 09:17:40 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: internationaly relvant? Dear Lela: To what country are you referring? On Fri, 19 Jan 1996, Lela Hilton wrote: > I have been told that Vandana's writings arent available in this country... > Any ideas where I might find them?? Thanks! > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 20 08:47:29 1996 Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 07:50:03 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lela Hilton) Subject: Re: internationaly relvant? Sorry --- the US. Thanks! >Dear Lela: > >To what country are you referring? > >On Fri, 19 Jan 1996, Lela Hilton wrote: > >> I have been told that Vandana's writings arent available in this country... >> Any ideas where I might find them?? Thanks! >>
