It seems like we are discussing the difference between "enclosure" and
"commons" to me. During Spring quarter here at Evergreen, I was enrolled
in a seminar called 'person, place...commons, culture'. We read books by
Terry Tempest Williams, Gary Snyder, and many others. One book in
particular comes to mind when I read the current discussion about
"developement". It is called "Whose Common Future?" and I think it is by
The Ecologist. If anyone is interested, I will find out the author for sure.
-Laura
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 16 23:07:49 1996
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 00:06:24 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (j griffith)
Subject: Re: women in international development
At 11:25 AM 8/15/96 -0700, S. Grubb wrote:
>I thought ecofeminists rejected the notion of "development?!"
hmmm, well, i suppose 'some' ecofeminists reject it on a critical level
because it creates a dichotomy between developed and nondeveloped, or
possibly because it assumes that those who are developed can manipulate
others, but in the end if one feminist stopped acting because anothe
feminist 'rejected' their idea, feminism would NOT exist. infighting among
feminists is probably the biggest reason that they dont mobilize.
jason
well you've seen the disease
suffering and decay
and you whisper to
yourself blisfully 'its ok'
and you still refuse the possibility
that the dead are better off than we
why do we pity the dead?
bad religion.
the gray race
