(just as the early
>suffragettes promoted the ideal of the woman voter, even if not all women
>voters fit that exact mold).
>
>William
>
Oh really William! The point is not that women vote better. Such a
thought is absurd! The point the early suffragettes made was that women
had no less an ability to decide on state matters than men. If we have to
prove that women are better than men to get equal rights .... well....
come on its just ridiculous!
And just because you have seen one woman (for example ) who has abused an
animal or beaten her husband does not in any way reduce the abhorence of
the act nor reduce the culpability of the men who are the main
purpetrators. In fact the fact that some women do it too, is just further
support for the argument that it is a cultural thing (men are brought up to
be violent and insensitive) and not a biological necessity for men to act
in this brutal way.
Kylie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
