moonshadow, 
some discussion and response:  first, thank you for the action and also 
your description of your engagement at headwaters!!  i have saved it to 
share with my youngest son who is concerned about trees here.   i will 
attempt brevity here, leaping and layering like haiku, so fill in with 
your own wisdom.  
trees: i suspect at least one buddha's realization involved sharing 
consciousness with a tree.  
thirteen moons, an old calendar before the sun was primary, when the 
earth was endowed with cyclical rythmns of sacred process  (how the 
vestiges of  guilt for violence are still projected.) a moon for each 
member of a sacred circle, coven.

samhain's spiral.

avoiding arrogance... this is a difficult art. last night i expressed 
my belief that an edge of uncertainty, favoring the unexpected keeps us 
present, learningwhat works and not replaying... timing keeping an edge, 
what it requires... in your account the loss of morale, the rain itself 
protecting the forest, a blessing.  this is a place for deepening in my 
aesthetic, evolving into something new by becoming vulnerable again
ecology and that awareness ... integrates different voices senses 
chorus, interdependency... even workers are included in this.  elegance 
teaches respect for old life, elders...  is inclusive.   we begin by 
wondering how to root and make whole.  this may take images, myths and 
their unpacking, other ways of speaking and moving awareness too.  
restoration, resitution... what is given back to the system we so 
mightily deplete?  what offering? balances and completes the cycle... 
even a penny for taking a plant... who speaks to these trees?  what for 
our energy, our cars and rayon dresses from rainforest growth, the 
unmerciful debt that is paid in trees, our economy growing desert and 
new human sufferings

and finally your reference to tampons and damage to womyns reproductive 
tract... so watershed,       those chemicals 
the metaphor 
as if this is All about protecting a womyns reproductive tract 
(grandmother growth) green womyn all around us, growing 
you might have seen this.  it was so clear to me.

some awareness requires multisensory engagement to fully orchestrate... 
images are powerful for mammals, the sudan, the holocaust, zaire, 
altamira... we cannot all be with the trees now but a powerful story 
will move us to expression, to repetition between friends... details and 
presence inform this.  yes, i was yearning for more, the smell and taste 
of the breath of these ancient life forms... (beside which we seem... 
and so naive
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec  5 10:59:26 1996
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 12:59:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Jennifer Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: quit subscribe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

quit subscribe
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec  5 11:43:30 1996
          by gladstone.uoregon.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 10:38:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Vanessa Micol Vanderbrug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ecofeminist definition

Hi, I have followed the list for some time now.  I would like to solicit 
some help on an ecofeminist literary critique I am writing on 
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.  I would be interested in any concrete 
definitions list subscribers have for the new term ecofeminism.  Do you 
agree that ecofeminists focus upon the parallel domination of women and 
the environment?  If so, why? Conversely, if not why not?  I personally 
believe that this definition lends itself to essentialism;  women are 
'naturally' closer to nature, etc.  Isn't this what the movement should 
attempt to avoid?  What do you think?  I'd love to hear some responses to 
this!  Thanks!
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec  6 03:56:35 1996
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 10:54:45 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ecofeminist definition

It doesn't necessarily entail essentialism at all. Read Val Plumwood or
Karen Warren or Chaia Heller for example. I fear you might have difficulty
defining 'ecofeminism' since it is certainly not monolithic. You might
want to read Carol J adams book - "The Sexual Politics Of Meat" (If you
have not done so already) as she discusses Shelley's Frankenstein in
some depth if memory serves...

-Richard :-)
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec  6 10:13:28 1996
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:15:06 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: quit subscribe




Commands for Negotiating ECOFEM:

All commands are sent to the following address:

        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The commands are placed within the body of the message, NOT on the
subject line.


For UNSUBSCRIBING, type:

    Unsub ecofem


Reply via email to