"unsubsribe"
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 15:46:11 MDT 1994
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 15:46:10 1994
Received: from case.cyberspace.com (cyberspace.com [199.2.48.12]) by csf.Colorado.EDU
(8.6.9/8.6.9/CNS-3.5) with SMTP id PAA12828 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 19 Oct
1994 15:46:09 -0600
Received: by case.cyberspace.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA18688; Wed, 19 Oct 94 14:51:32 PDT
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 14:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Faith BarrGlover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Vegetarian Conferences
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> On Sat, 15 Oct 1994, Brian A. Luke wrote:
>
> >(BTW, one of the nice things about vegetarianism is it doesn't take > any
> >precious time away from our work for gays and lesbians, workers, > women,
> >the environment, etc.)
> >
My perception is that vegetarianism is taking a LOT of time away from
what this group could be doing about the environment ... I think once
someone has given the diehard meat-eaters relevant information (not
opinions) regarding the environmental devastation caused by the US
current overconsumption of meat, especially beef, you've done what you can.
I'm getting ready to hit the delete key when I hit this issue, and unless
and until I can see Brian headed off on another issue, I may hit delete
when I see his name for a whilee.
I'm REALLY tired of this issue.
Faith
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 16:05:41 MDT 1994
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 16:05:40 1994
Received: from triton.unm.edu (triton.unm.edu [129.24.8.235]) by csf.Colorado.EDU
(8.6.9/8.6.9/CNS-3.5) with SMTP id QAA14722 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 19 Oct
1994 16:05:39 -0600
Received: by triton.unm.edu (Smail3.1.28.1 #6)
id m0qxjAr-0001EgC; Wed, 19 Oct 94 16:07 MDT
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 16:07:56 -0600 (MDT)
From: anne jordan dashiell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Vegetarian Conferences
To: Faith BarrGlover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> I'm REALLY tired of this issue.
ME TOO!! i have NOTHING to comment on this issue, and i think its
consumption of this list is really unfair and elitist, because I FOR ONE
DO NOT ATTEND AND HAVE NO INEREST, AND PROBABLY WOULDNT EVEN BE INVITED
TO ATTEND feminist academic conferences, and to be honest, the thought of
a bunch of academic feminists sitting at a table spouting off theories
and quoting papers and books up the ass makes me pretty sick. plus NOT
EVERYONE ON THIS LIST IS EVEN IN COLLEGE!!!!!! -anne
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 16:50:05 MDT 1994
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 16:50:05 1994
Received: from atlas.csusm.edu (atlas.csusm.edu [144.37.1.250]) by csf.Colorado.EDU
(8.6.9/8.6.9/CNS-3.5) with SMTP id QAA16166 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 19 Oct
1994 16:50:03 -0600
Received: from coyote.csusm.edu by atlas.csusm.edu; id AA05095
sendmail 4.1/CSUSM-GW-1.2
Wed, 19 Oct 94 16:02:18 PDT for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by coyote.csusm.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/TM-02)
id AA24238; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 15:50:17 -0700
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 15:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Monique Flannagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Monique Flannagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New discussion of criticism on ecofem
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I'm new on the list and anxious for some responses to ecofem.
criticism. In one text I have just finished reading (I think the title is
"Rethinking Ecofeminism") claims that ecofeminism supports the status qou
by mystifying the relationship between society and nature. She sees
social ecology more helpful in explaining what ecofeminist have called as
"interconnectedness" and "oneness." I too have a problem with Reisler's
vision of the Neolithic "partnership" society and the sense that we need
to go back to that kind of society. Doesn't embracing the Goddess seem a
little sexist? It does to me. Anyway I feel I am throwing these gems
out in hopes to get another discussion going (other than vegetarianism).
Could someone, at least, suggest texts that respond to criticism
similar to the ones above?
