dear all, I am researching the application of ecofeminism to the campaign against the proposed uranium mine at Jabiluka, in Australia's Kakadu National Park. I have been attempting to locate literature which discusses the ecofeminist belief that women, nature and indigenous people are linked by their common oppression. I can find lots on the idea that women & nature are linked, but not so much on how indigenous people & women are linked. The best that I've found so far is Noel Sturgeon's book. Can anyone suggest anything which delves into this issue in detail? Journal articles in particular would be excellent. thanks heaps! Monica. >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 26 19:01:00 1998 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 21:00:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Bertina Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Separatism and the paradox of the battered male In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I always thought that this was an environmental listserv and not an abuse or battered support listserv. If we do decide to bring up the issue, lets not exclude anyone! My .2 worth, Bertina [EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, bunny wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It is heart warming to see the support that males give each other when > > warranted. I would like to see more encouragement and support between females > > to help those caught up in domestic violence escape (perhaps more bonding > > and "mateship" amongst females and more openess and less denial about male > > abuse). > > I say go for it sister! :> > > > > > Perhaps battered males should have their own list to be supportive of > > each other (no offence meant but every time people here try to raise the > > issue of battered women and children and the high death rates of the two > > from DV, we always have the fringe male groups appear and cry DV > > themselves when that is not the issue being addressed - usually in > > newspapers etc). > > > > Thanks for pigeonholing me as a fringe male and discounting the nature of > my abuse. Very friendly and respectful, eh? > > > > In Australia, millions of dollars have been put aside for a study into > > violence amongst men. It makes me so sick in the stomach that this is > > aother allocation of funding from a male dominated government to find > > out why men are being violent (there is already so much known about this > > as to make this amount of money unacceptably high when abused women are > > lacking essential services and basic support!!!! and meanwhile women and > > children are dying from DV.). > > > > And so why should men be excluded from a dialog on ecofeminism because of > this? I want these facts that you cite and which I hardly deny to change. > And I am stepping forward to do my part in participating in changing that > by being a member of this list and working to support ecofeminist theory > in American Acadamia. I have worked very hard also and have a translation > of Francoise d'Eaubonne's original work on ecofeminism in the works. I > resent your desire to exclude me and your labeling of me as fringe and not > a representative of my sex. I feel your labels are rooted in homophobia > ingrained in all of us by patriarchy. > > I *am* a man, and I speak for mySelf... which is in large part a big wavy > "feminine" love-fest. If I'm on the fringe, so be it. But please don't > discount my experience and my willingness to transform the ecological > crisis with which we are now faced and for which we are ALL responsible in > some way or another. > > Jacob > > > > Marguerite > > > > > > In a message dated 8/26/98 11:04:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > << I am dismayed at the recent posts about wanting to find an ecofeminism > > > listserv "free of males" and by feminists essentialism leading to > > > separatism. >> > > > > > > Jacob...welcome. It is good to hear from you. But please don't think of > > 'feminist essentialism' being separatist or male hating. After all, if > > someone wanted to go off and study the life and thought of Abraham Lincoln > > with other students of Lincoln, no one would think them separatist...they > > would, I think, be seen as scholars and philosophers trying to understand the > > world around them. Or if they wanted to go off and study Spanish with others > > who were learning it, or speaking it, I really don't think they would be > > considered haters of non-Spanish speaking peoples. Again, they would be seen > > as dedicated students of the art. > > > > The world of women's thought, language, history, philosophy and culture is one > > that, really, is only beginning to be explored. It is terribly difficult to > > be endlessly baited as exclusionary when one is really only attempting to > > understand, focus, heal, and harvest from a world that has been silenced for > > so long. One of the most hurtful ways of closing off scholarship and > > philosophical adventures in that world is to claim that, by so doing, we are > > in some way evincing a pathological dislike or separatist stance from men (not > > that separatism is necessarily pathological). > > > > The ultimate idea is, I think, as Carlos suggested...inclusion. But before > > you can include someone in the results of your adventures, you have to take > > the adventure journey. And sometimes, that is best done alone. > > > > Regards and respect for your personal courage, > > Madrone > > > > =========================================================================== > > /`\ /`\ RABBIT INFORMATION SERVICE: _ _ > > (/\ \-/ /\) P.O.Box 30, Riverton, Western Australia 6148 (.\_/.) > > )6 6( http://www.wantree.com.au/~rabbit/rabbit.htm \6 6/ > > >{= Y =}< VEGETARIAN PAGE =\ /= > > /'-^-'\ http://www.geocities/RainForest/4620 /O\ / > > (_) (_) / \ ( > > | . | U U ) > > | |} Pity the human race its illusion of permanence (| |)/ > > \_/^\_/ w'-'w > > =========================================================================== > > > > > > >
