Date sent: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 10:39:55 EST
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: hypocrites?/convictions/spirit/believe
whatever/perception/That's life!
> In a message dated 98-12-05 18:25:20 EST, you write:
>
> <<
> Now you're telling me you're an anti-choice feminist; that's like being
> a black member of the Ku Klux Klan or a Jewish Nazi. Next, you'll
> tell me you're an anti-ecosystem environmentalist. Joe
> >>
> Hi!
>
> You did not answer my question Joe - apparently, accusing me of being- anti-
> feminist was your reply to a very serious question that needs answering.
>
> I pro-Making women equal heirs to a life of grace to men - Is that anti-
> feminist?
> I am pro- putting aside personal rights to putting forth global responsibility
> whenever possible is that anti-ecosystem? I think not!
>
> Again, I am pro-life - but anti-revenge, anti-playing moral judge (God is the
> Judge of each individual - we can only support others to help them make good
> decisions that is all I am pro - support to do the right thing. If someone is
> faced with a moral question - to keep a baby or not - that is between them and
> God - I would support keeping the baby and finding all possible alternatives -
> but I am not that persons judge and jury if they decide not to.
>
> People have to decide for themselves that they want to be good - because they
> know themselves that being good is favored to being bad - in their own spirits
> - they need to feel the need to be good - and we all agree that preserving all
> life is good - right? Or is just some life, sometimes, (again aren't we making
> dangerous exceptions)?
>
> Peace!
> Angela
>
The true danger is in uncontrolled human proliferation overwhelming
species diversity, sapping our resources and toxifying our
environment. It is on just this issue that your anti-choice and anti-
ecosystem stances converge. Because of this, I consider you to
be the EcoFem AntiChrist! Joe
