FYI...

X-posted from H-ASEH (by permission).

Stefanie Rixecker
ECOFEM Coordinator

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------

    Francis Spufford. _I may be some Time: Ice and the
    English Imagination_. New York: St. Martin's Press
    1997. 372 pp. Illustrations. $ 26.95 (cloth), ISBN 0-
    312-17442-X

    Reviewed for H-ASEH by Angela Schwarz, <Dr. A.
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, University of Duisburg,
    Germany


    The Ultimate Challenge

    There are not many parts of the globe that have
    fascinated western and particular English imagination
    to such an extent as the polar regions have. Although
    at least the Arctic had been a human habitat for
    thousands of years on the arrival of Europeans,
    explorers, whalers, travellers from the warmer regions
    came to envisage the polar world as an environment
    utterly and relentlessly hostile to human existence,
    the whiteness or rather colourlessness of ice and snow
    epitomizing nullity and desolation. That very moment
    of seeing and envisaging was the starting-point for
    the stylization of the poles as a place of mystery and
    ultimate challenge for man, bringing about a lasting
    fascination with this challenge and the expeditions of
    those who were to accept it.

    Francis Spufford aptly begins with the question why,
    considering the hostility of this great unknown, men
    should have taken it upon themselves to face this
    ordeal - to get to the gist of the matter one might
    add that the unkown could be the Antarctic just as
    well as some South American or African jungle teeming
    with dangers for say an early nineteenth-century
    explorer. And if some individuals chose to risk their
    lives on expeditions only vaguely mapped out
    beforehand why should others, sitting snugly in their
    armchairs by the fireside, the amenities of life at
    arm's length, eagerly devour reports and expositions
    of their struggles? To get at people's motives one
    must go, as Spufford convincingly argues, beyond
    material gain or the mere acquisition of knowledge
    about geographical expansion. Rather, one must look at
    the imagination, into the collective memory of the
    English nation and the images and myths of the polar
    regions, of national virtues and of an enterprising
    national character.

    Consequently, the book unfolds not a polar history of
    the Parrys, Franklins, Shackletons and Scotts as it
    has already been written many times over, but a
    largely unchartered history of "assumptions, responses
    to landscape, cultural fascinations, aesthetic
    attraction to the cold regions" (p. 6) as they have
    influenced ideas of the polar regions from the late
    eighteenth up to the early twentieth century. Thus, it
    is a book on representations of a landscape and of its
    exploration in English culture, in itself a landscape
    of the mind full of original observations connecting
    Edmund Burke as aesthetic theorist with literati like
    Charlotte Bront�, Samuel T. Coleridge, John Keats,
    Charles Dickens, the Americans Edgar Allan Poe and
    Herman Melville, the Dane Hans Christian Andersen
    among others with nineteenth-century anthropologists
    like Edward Tylor.

    In order to explain the attraction of Victorian women
    to narratives of polar exploration Spufford not only
    looks into the position of the explorers' wives
    staying at home, passive and loyal, as the ideal would
    have it that found its most perfect expression in the
    image constructed of Sir John Franklin's wife. He sees
    a parallel in the virtues demanded from men venturing
    forth into the polar world and the virtues attached to
    an ideal Victorian femininity, i.e. endurance,
    perseverance and resignation. This interpretation may
    provoke dissent, it nonetheless deserves to be
    examined in a more detailed analysis of female
    perception of the travellers in British popular
    culture - here only one aspect among many others.

    There will be little or no controversy about the very
    convincing central argument of the book about motives
    that goes a long way at explaining not only
    the British fascination with the "icie seas" as Martin Frobisher wrote
in 1576
    but the amateurism characteristic of the British expeditions in
contrast to
    those of other nationalities. Taking up the challenge of polar nature
was a
    continuation of "a bucaneering English past" (p. 184) into the
comparatively
    unadventurous industrial present of the Victorian era, was another
enactment of
    English pluck, of English virtues, giving reassurance amidst growing
anxiety.
    In taking up the ultimate challenge, then, success or survival did not
matter.
    The British at home did not accept the explorers' death as the final
triumph of
    nature over man, they rather believed that some part of them had
withstood
    corruption. Therefore, mistakes or gross incompetence
    of men like Franklin or Scott, who died because of
    them, could not prevent British polar exploration from
    being idealized, its participants from being revered
    as national heroes. Reading this "archaeology of the
    hazy love affair between the ice and the English" (p.
    7) one begins to understand the attraction and its
    lure even today.

    Copyright (c) 1998 by H-Net, all rights reserved. This
    work may be copied for non-profit educational use if
    proper credit is given to the reviewer and to ASEH.
    For other permission, please contact hbooks@h-
    net.msu.edu or [EMAIL PROTECTED]



************************************
Dr. Stefanie S. Rixecker
Division of Environmental Management & Design
Lincoln University, Canterbury
PO Box 84
Aotearoa New Zealand
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: 64-03-325-3841
************************************

Reply via email to