At Sun, 14 Mar 1999 21:13:26 PST, you wrote:
>
>Joe wrote:
>. Has nicole informed you that she can't take another insult hit and is
>now getting you to do her incitement work for her?
>
>GS: No, just as Chris King chooses to nurture his chosen ones, as do I
>choose to point it out when someone I admire on this list is being
>personally insulted and threatened by you
>
I'm calling you on it; post the threat. You can't, I know, as there never was one.
As to insults, I'm the tortoise and she's the hare in that department.
>
>Joe:You're outta luck; I won't respond, except to note
>that I'm pretty sure that this constitutes a personal attack, an as
>such, is
>deserving of a warning.
>
>GS:My writing that your post was vulgar and unwarranted on this list
>(anyone reading you original post would realise where it belongs)
>is pointing out fact. You should be able to deal with this as you chose
>to place the original post on the list.(Re Patriarchy Erect)
>
It sounds like you still have not read nicole's "hot lead simsex" post, my acknowlrged
model. Will you be fair, and read, post and comment on it? Naaah.
>
>Joe: Your intolerance of my voice on this list is not my
>problem, nor will I make it my problem.
>
>GS:THis is a typical male ploy. If I *disagree * with your arguments or
>*actions* , I am *intolerant*.. but it is OK for you to attack and
>belittle other people on the list as part of your *discussion*
>
I have responded to attacks directed against me for no good or rational reason, true;
you are the one who began attacking me without personal provocation, and continue to
do so. Does nicole require your defence, or are you still trying to needle me into
another insult like the ones you so freely fling about? I have simply refused to be
branded as either a racist or a rapist (though I will cop to being an occasional
romantic); I have not engaged in belittlement, but continue to belive that vicious
slanders such as yours are even more egregious offences.
>
>Joe:The derogations and insults you direct
>my way, OTOH, should be your problem, and I trust that they will be.
>
>GS:No, I just expanded on your original post. If you want to place
>descriptions of your bodily functions on the internet, there are plenty
>of ways of doing that without posting them to this list. I was only
>educating you as to this matter.
>
You might educate nicole on the same matter, as she did it first. Does the fact that
she did it first mean that you also consider her to be of lowly mental maturity, or
was that simply reserved for me because of my sex? If the former, you are invited to
educate her as well. If the latter, once again the problem is yours, not mine.
>GS
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>
Joe E. Dees
Poet, Pagan, Philosopher
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access your e-mail anywhere, at any time.
Get your FREE BellSouth Web Mail account today!
http://webmail.bellsouth.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
