Perhaps I should explain more fully that last comment. i don't understand the reasoning behind the spelling of "womyn" other than to totally disassociate ourselves from men. And I don't want to do that. I am a feminist, but I also love men, and do not see a problem with the word "woman" or "she" or "female", because it includes men, who are carried in womb or a woman. It is inclusive, rather than divisive. Now, I also understand the the origins of the word "woman" are from archaic English: "wif-man", but changing the last syllable does nothing to change the meaning of the word...it just looks contrived to me. If you really want to change the word, we really need to change the first syllable, not the last. There must be some archaic Greek word for people of our gender that does not define as an appendage to a man, but does not separate us from each other yet keeps our genders understood. And this should be for both sexes, because "man", "he" and "male" do not include our gender at all, while the words that describe our gender do include them. So in a perverse one could almost say that the words used for those of the opposite gender are disempowering more for them than for us. I don't know if I'm making much sense here. Joy Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scion in the Church of All Worlds "The Garrulous Grok Flok" Thou Art Goddess!
Re: yet another earth as mother comment
Dancing Hummingbird /aka Joy Williams Wed, 29 Mar 1995 11:02:45 -0800 (PST)
- Re: yet another earth as mother comm... Dancing Hummingbird /aka Joy Williams
- Re: yet another earth as mother... Judy Smith
- Re: yet another earth as mother... Dancing Hummingbird /aka Joy Williams
- Re: yet another earth as mother... Kylie Matthews
- Re: yet another earth as mo... gretchen hughes
