----- forwarded message -----
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 16:49:51 +0200
From: info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Canada to Sign International Biosafety Protocol
----- forwarded message -----
Subject: [gaia-l] Canada to Sign International Biosafety Protocol
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 21:30:00 -0300
From: "Mark Graffis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Environment ENS -- Environment News Service


OTTAWA, Canada, April 6, 2001 (ENS) - An agreement to regulate the movement
of genetically modified organisms across international borders is a step
closer to fruition after Canada announced yesterday it would sign the 
international protocol.

Canada is one of the world's leading producers, exporters and importers of
living modified organisms, such as corn, canola, potatoes and soybeans.
Yesterday, Environment Minister David Anderson announced Canada would sign
the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.

The goal of the Cartagena Protocol, negotiated under the United Nations
Convention on Biological Diversity, is to protect biodiversity while
permitting trade of living modified plants, animals and micro-organisms.

Biodiversity is defined under the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity as
the "variability among living organisms from all sources."

Recognizing public concerns over genetically modified organisms, some 177
member governments of the UN Biological Diversity convention have spent
years discussing practical steps for minimizing the potential risks of
biotechnology.

Genetically modified (GM) organisms have had their genetic material altered
in a way that does not occur naturally by mating or natural recombination.
By genetically engineering an organism, individual genes can be selected and
transferred from organism into another, sometimes between non-related species.

Food companies might transfer useful genes into plants that lack them to
make them more resistant to disease or pesticide. But some scientists and
non-governmental offices such as Greenpeace are concerned about genetic
engineering's potential side effects.

Their concerns that GM crops and GM food could create allergies, harm
biodiversity and eliminate indigenous species have raised awareness among
consumers who are increasingly demanding tougher laws regarding labeling and
international trade.

The protocol signed in the Columbian city of Cartagena in 1999 and adopted
in Montreal, Canada, in 2000 attempts to ensure that GM organisms are
handled and transferred safely across borders.

Eighty six countries have signed the protocol and two have ratified it -
Bulgaria and Trinidad and Tobago. The protocol will come into force 90 days
after 50 countries ratify it, which is likely within two or three years
according to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), which
administers the Secretariat for the 1992 Biodiversity Convention, under
which the protocol was negotiated.

"Canada already has a domestic regulatory framework for biotechnology
products," said Anderson. "Our signature to the protocol demonstrates our
continued commitment to international cooperation and builds on our domestic
and international actions to protect the environment and human health."

"We will take a leadership role in achieving a protocol that is workable and
protects the environment without causing unnecessary trade disruptions,"
said Agriculture Minister Lyle Vanclief.

Since the late 1980s, a domestic science based regulatory system has
overseen and approved the release of more than 100 genetically modified
organisms into the Canadian environment.

According to Greenpeace, GM canola in Canada is developing into a major weed
problem, which requires the use of conventional toxic herbicides for
removal. The group claims that the U.S. has spent more than a billion
dollars trying to recall potentially allergenic GM Starlink corn, which has
contaminated 430 million bushels of harvest.

Canada will sign the international protocol on April 19 at a meeting of the
Commission on Sustainable Development at the United Nations in New York.
Anderson said the government would consider ratification of the protocol
based on progress achieved in international discussions.

The country has played a key role in developing the protocol. It helped
broker the consensus between exporter countries and importer countries in
the final negotiations prior to the protocol being adopted in January 2000
in Montréal.

Developing countries will be helped to implement the protocol through the
Global Environment Facility (GEF), which is funded by donor countries
including Canada. For example, UNEP will implement a $39 million GEF project
that will help 100 countries prepare National Biosafety Frameworks.

The three and half year project will cultivate information exchanges and
best practices among developing countries and countries with economies in
transition, through a series of global and regional workshops.

Canada acknowledged that several issues must be clarified before it and most
other countries ratify the protocol. These issues include

* a system for information sharing, including the Biosafety Clearing House
* a review of international rules and standards relating to the handling,
transport, packaging and identification of genetically modified organisms
* options for establishing a compliance regime
* facilitating decision making by countries that may wish to import GM
organisms

Under the protocol, governments will decide whether or not to accept imports
of GM organisms on the basis of risk assessments. These scientific
assessments are to be undertaken according to recognized risk assessment
techniques.

Because the protocol is based on the precautionary approach, importers can
decide not to accept imports of GM organisms "if there is a lack of
scientific certainty due to insufficient scientific information and
knowledge on whether or not the organism poses a risk to the environment or
human health," said UNEP.

Reply via email to