[ok, kind of wierd - transgenic mutations to detect stuff that pollutes the
enviro - now, if this was someone doing it themselves (anti-pollution tattoos)
to "prove" pollution, it might not be such a bad idea ... will]
----- forwarded message -----
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 16:10:30 -0800
From: radtimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Why Goldfish Might Turn Blue

  http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,49185,00.html
Why Goldfish Might Turn Blue
By Dermot McGrath
2:00 a.m. Dec. 24, 2001 PST


Say goodbye to Birkenstock sandals and woolly jumpers --
tomorrow's eco-warrior will like nothing better than swimming
naked in defense of cleaner oceans.

That, at least, is the hope of researchers in Singapore, who are
developing a breed of fish capable of detecting water pollutants
by changing color.

Scientists at the Department of Biological Sciences at Singapore's
National University intend to produce commercially viable zebra
fish that can be used as a simple, cheaper alternative to current
pollutant-testing systems.

Zebra fish are usually black and silver in color, but through
genetic manipulation researchers have produced a few varieties
that radiate green or red fluorescent color.

Scientists have so far succeeded in isolating two types of gene
promoters in the zebra fish -- an estrogen-inducible promoter and
a stress-responsive promoter.
These promoters -- the part of the gene that contains the
information to turn the gene on or off -- have been used to drive
the fluorescent color genes in transgenic zebra fish. A transgenic
organism is one that contains genes from another species.
According to researchers, such zebra fish will be able to respond
to the presence of chemicals like estrogen, heavy metals and
various toxins in water.

"The most significant benefit of the biomonitoring fish is the
possibility to develop an online system to monitor aquatic
environment and water quality," project leader Zhiyuan Gong,
associate professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at
Singapore's National University, said. "Compared to conventional
chemical measurement, the live fish can tell us the biological
effect of the pollutants."

The fish will immediately display the color depending on the type
of environment the color has been specified for. Although only red
and green colors have been produced in the zebra fish thus far,
Gong and his team believe that they can produce up to as many as
five colors, with each color indicating a different pollutant.

The main advantages of such transgenic fish is that pollutants can
be detected with one quick look, and the fish are also economical
to breed and biodegradable. All these factors make them very
suitable pollutant indicators, said Gong.

Other researchers warn, however, that significant hurdles need to
be overcome before transgenic fish can ever be commercially
deployed as pollution indicators.

"Any truly useful environmental monitoring tool should give us a
signal which can be interpreted ecologically," said Donald Baird,
a researcher with the environment group at the Institute of
Aquaculture in the University of Stirling in Scotland.

"Molecular genetic signals such as color-changing fish are merely
proxies for chemical analysis -- they tell us nothing about
quantity of the substance present, merely that a threshold has
been passed at a specific receptor site in the organism," he said.

Baird believes that a more sensible approach would be to work with
gene micro-arrays, which offer the possibility of simultaneously
detecting a wide range of pollutants by examining the regulation
of proteins.

"This would be a cheap and non-destructive method of assessing
chemical exposure. And it would not involve the use of live
vertebrates which is now seen, quite rightly, as ethically
untenable in routine monitoring and is gradually being phased
out," he said.

Gong estimated that it would take at least another year before the
project moves beyond the experimental phase.

"We can create such monitoring fish now using our existing
techniques. However, we are still not sure how (sensitively) the
fish can monitor environmental pollution and will need to do a lot
of fine-tuning work," Gong conceded.

Besides zebra fish, marine species such as the carp and goldfish
can also be genetically engineered to display different
fluorescent colors. The Singapore team is working toward producing
fish that give off a different-colored glow depending on water
temperature, which may lead to using fluorescent fish as
temperature indicators.

Richard Winn, associate professor of the Aquatic Biotechnology and
Environmental Lab at the University of Georgia said this is not
the first time transgenic fish have been proposed as possible
pollution indicators.

"The concept of the environmental 'sentinel' is not new -- fish
and other critters have been doing this for quite some time," he
said.

Winn is also skeptical that color-changing fish can offer a
radical alternative to current pollution-monitoring techniques.

"An important requirement of a test system is that it should
provide an indication not only of the presence of a toxic chemical
but also a graded response relative to the amount of chemical
present," he said.

"While it is valuable to know the organism has been exposed to
compound ABC, it is often even more helpful to know that the
organism was exposed to X amount of the compound, which produced
the Y effect. Quite simply, any system that can provide a
quantitative measure of a response is very valuable."

Winn points out that even assuming the initial tests show the
system works as planned, it may be a significant hurdle to
actually receive permission to release the genetically modified
fish in the wild.

"There is some difference in opinion about the real or imagined
impact of releasing transgenic fish into the environment," he
said. "Depending upon the fish species and the transgenes used,
the possible impacts could range from inconsequential to localized
extinction of native species. This should be studied thoroughly
before any release is considered."

A study last year by researchers at Purdue University concluded
that transgenic fish could present a significant threat to native
wildlife, even to the point of extinction.

Anne Kapuscinski, professor of Fisheries and Conservation Biology
and founding director of the Institute for Social, Economic and
Ecological Sustainability (ISEES) at the University of Minnesota,
agreed that a lot more research needed to be carried out to assess
the potential risk of releasing transgenic fish into the
environment.

"In some fish species, adults of one gender or the other use color
to attract mates and successfully reproduce. Genetically
engineered changes in external color might interfere with the
mate-attraction strategy in harmful ways or might have little or
no impact," said Kapuscinski.

She stressed the importance of conducting ecologically relevant
bio-safety studies to credibly assess environmental risk at an
early stage in the research and development of transgenic
organisms.

"So far, researchers have been waiting until much too late in the
R&D process to enlist qualified fish biologists and ecologists to
address the bio-safety questions," she said.

Reply via email to