http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/52549_yebiotech29.shtml

Biotechnology in the public eye 

>From terrorism to stem cells, field will play an even more prominent role in
2002

Saturday, December 29, 2001

By PAUL ELIAS
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

SAN FRANCISCO -- At the dawn of the new millennium, biotechnology finally began
to matter to people outside laboratories
and brokerage houses.

Scientists began deciphering the human genome in 2001, human embryos were
cloned, and gene research gained new urgency
as microbiologists joined the battle against a suddenly very real danger --
bioterrorism.

In 2002, scientists hope to turn their understanding of how genes work into
drugs, extract human embryonic stem cells from
cloned embryos and develop powerful vaccines against germ warfare.

Already, researchers at the University of Wisconsin report success in the lab
turning human embryonic stem cells into human
brain cells, a critical step toward creating an endless supply of transplantable
neural cells and tissue to repair spinal cord injuries
and cell-based diseases like Parkinson's.

"Stem cell therapy has reached the heartland," said Lee Silver, a Princeton
University microbiologist and an authority on cloning
and stem cell science. "Most people in America know somebody with a disease."

Lobbying from patients helped persuade President Bush in August to authorize
federally financed research on existing human
embryonic stem cell lines.

Nonetheless, the battle over destroying human embryos to obtain stem cells will
be taken up again in 2002, with the Senate
expected to consider legislation that would criminalize all human cloning
efforts.

While lawmakers and activists take aim at the scientists and companies working
with embryonic stem cells, a handful of
companies such as Aastrom Biosciences, Curis Inc. and StemCells Inc. are quietly
working with adult stem cells, which are
derived from blood and organs without harm to embryos or people.

On the biotech business front, analysts predict massive consolidation next year,
ushered in by Amgen Inc.'s proposed $16
billion acquisition of rival Immunex Corp.

Analysts also say 2002 will be the year monoclonal antibodies, the original
bioengineered proteins that launched the
biotechnology industry a quarter century ago, will finally start to pay off. Ten
monoclonal antibody drugs are on the market
today, and dozens more are in various stages of human trials. Several could be
approved by Food and Drug Administration in
2002. 

Meanwhile, the bioterrorism threat has placed microbiologists on center stage.

In addition to helping try to track down whomever was behind the killing of five
Americans with anthrax, microbiologists are
being called on to create germ warfare detectors, rapidly diagnose attacks and
create vaccines and drugs.

"Biotechnology is exercising its muscle as it grows into young adulthood," said
Carl Feldbaum, president of the Biotechnology
Industry Organization. "We are seeing a whole new relationship between the
biotech industry and the Department of Defense."

Nobody know this better than Paul Keim. Until Sept. 11, the Northern Arizona
University professor was an affable and
well-respected scientist previously unknown to just about everybody outside the
field of microbiology.

In May, Keim and his students had quickly solved the mystery of why prairie dogs
were dying en masse in northern Arizona.

Using DNA "fingerprinting" techniques developed by Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory and matching the results to
Keim's vast inventory of microbial genomes, the team diagnosed bubonic plague in
a matter of hours.

Federal officials have called on Keim's detective skills to try to identify the
source of the anthrax attacks.

But it's not just anthrax that worries the nation.

Microbiologists are being asked to create vaccines that can combat a number of
pathogens, including small pox, bubonic
plague and Ebola. They are also being called on to develop defenses against
"superbugs," pathogens genetically engineered to
render current vaccines powerless.

"Germ warfare has garnered all the recent attention," said Jeremy Rifkin, a
prominent anti-biotech activist. "But the biggest story
in biotechnology is human cloning."

On the Sunday after Thanksgiving, Chief Executive Michael West of Advanced Cell
Technology announced that his company
had succeeded in cloning a human embryo.

More specifically, it was a tiny bundle of human cells, created by fusing adult
cumulus cells -- ovarian cells that surround eggs
after ovulation -- with human eggs stripped of their DNA.

Three of the eight creations developed in cell bundles, with the best making it
to six cells before it stopped dividing.

None of the cloned embryos grew large enough to generate any stem cells. But the
process did renew the fierce debate over
human embryonic stem cells, which had been overshadowed by bioterrorism fears
after Sept. 11.

"We are using design principles to architect our destiny," Rifkin said. "We are
losing the spontaneity of creating life."

Advanced Cell is not interested in creating cloned humans, West maintains. He
says its ultimate goal is "therapeutic cloning,"
creating stem cells that can be grown into custom medical treatments, using
embryos cloned from patients' own cells.

For stem cell science to pay off as disease therapies, Princeton's
microbiologist Silver said, cloning embryos will be necessary.

"But there's still public confusion over cloning," Silver said. "There is a
hysteria surrounding cloning."

Silver said cloning scientists will need to coin a new term for their work, like
doctors did when they dropped the word "nuclear"
from nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Therapeutic cloning holds great promise as a disease cure, scientists say,
although such customized solutions may be
prohibitively expensive.

Stem cells, created in the first days of pregnancy, later sprout into the more
than 200 different cells that make up the human
body. Scientists hope to someday manipulate stem cells into adult cells of their
choosing.

Few scientists doubt the therapeutic promise of stem cells, but the controversy
over their source -- human embryos -- could
shut down certain avenues of research in the coming year -- or at least drive it
overseas.

President Bush, Pope John Paul II and a host of others were quick to condemn
West's cloning announcement. Many see
West's work as a slippery slope that will lead to selective breeding of the
human race.

"I think this is a watershed event in history," Rifkin said. "It's another step
toward a eugenics society."

� 1998-2002 Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Reply via email to