Bill,

Are you sure it is styrofoam and not vermiculite?  They are similar  
in appearance at the macroscopic level.

David

David M Bryant Ph D
University of New Hampshire
Environmental Education Program
Durham, NH 03824

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
978-356-1928



On Jan 23, 2006, at 4:57 PM, RESEARCH Hilton Pond wrote:

>
> I've just discarded (i.e., placed in a compost pile) several  
> Poinsettias left over from the holidays. All these came from  
> different sources, but all had small (1/8 to 1/4/ inch) pellets of  
> Styrofoam mixed in with the soil.
>
> These Styrofoam additives are a pretty common practice at  
> commercial nurseries. I always assumed it was to aerate the soil so  
> it didn't get too soggy.
>
> Wonder how this practice got started at nurseries and what it would  
> take to get them to stop?
>
> Happy Nature Watching!
>
> BILL
>
> ===========
>
>> Warren,
>>
>> I've read this thread with some consternation as a soil  
>> scientist.  I know this may sound like recycling of styrofoam but  
>> it's really putting xenobiotics (highly recalcitrant synthetics)  
>> into the soil.  I'm not really sure if it would meet your other  
>> goal either.  While quantitatively decreasing soil bulk density,  
>> as does soil organic matter (SOM) I doubt that it provides any of  
>> the other benefits of SOM.  Styrofoam is a closed cell material,  
>> so even with a high surface area (internally and externally) I  
>> doubt that soil solution or nutrients can interact with these  
>> surfaces to provide cation/anion exchange or enhance soil aeration  
>> as the cells are generally filled with a synthetic gas (previously  
>> these were CFCs).
>>
>> Also, there is increasing evidence that plastics release synthetic  
>> compounds, the effects of some are known others unknown.   
>> Moreover, organic chemistry of the SOM and plastics degradation  
>> are not well understood.
>>
>> If you have any data or literature on these questions I would be  
>> very interested.  In lieu of any evidence of benefits/hazards I  
>> would strongly advise against the practice.
>>
>> David
>>
>> David M Bryant Ph D
>> University of New Hampshire
>> Environmental Education Program
>> Durham, NH 03824
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 978-356-1928
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Warren W. Aney wrote:
>>
>>>  I hope to solve two problems:
>>>  --recycling of styrofoam
>>>  --improving the texture of of high clay content soils
>>>
>>>  Warren Aney
>>>  (503)246-8613
>>>
>>>    -----Original Message-----
>>>    From: Wayne Tyson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>    Sent: Sunday, 22 January, 2006 22:51
>>>    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
>>>    Subject: Re: Birds and styrofoam pellets
>>>
>>>
>>>    What do you hope to accomplish, and what led you to do it?
>>>
>>>    WT
>>>
>>>    At 01:21 PM 1/22/2006, Warren W. Aney wrote:
>>>
>>>      I have been using small (<5 mm) styrofoam pellets as a soil   
>>> additive.
>>>  Since
>>>      they tend to accumulate on the soil surface, these whitish   
>>> pellets might
>>>      easily be ingested by ground foraging birds.  I've done a  
>>> quick  Google
>>>      search and found little information indicating whether or  
>>> not this
>>>  material
>>>      might be ingested or, if ingested, that it will have  
>>> adverse  effects.
>>>  Does
>>>      anyone have any information regarding this?
>>>
>>>      Warren Aney
>>>      (503)246-8613
>
>
> -- 
>
> RESEARCH PROGRAM
> c/o BILL HILTON JR. Executive Director
> Hilton Pond Center for Piedmont Natural History
> 1432 DeVinney Road, York, South Carolina 29745 USA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], (803) 684-5852, eFax: (503) 218-0845
>
> Please visit our web sites (courtesy of Comporium.net):
> Hilton Pond Center for Piedmont Natural History at http:// 
> www.hiltonpond.org
> "Operation RubyThroat: The Hummingbird Project" at http:// 
> www.rubythroat.org
>
> **********

Reply via email to