I am a high school environmental science teacher.  I have been following
the discussion here and it's fascinating.  I have copied the discussion and
will modify it for class use in order to spur a series of classroom
discussions.  DON'T WORRY!  I will remove names and contact info.  I will
retain only the region that the reply came from.

*My vote is a Manhattan Project scale Solar Power project in the southwest
of the USA.  Use huge amounts of solar power to produce hydrogen and
transport hydrogen using the existing natural gas pipelines.  I know this
is a bit ambitious, but if we look at the productivity of Americans during
WWII to fight a war, we should be able to be as productive now in order to
address major environmental issues.  We just need to galvinize the people
behind such a project.

Always dreaming big,

Josh Leonard
Environmental Science Teacher
Como Park Senior High School
St. Paul, MN


On 8 Feb 2006, Bomar, Charles wrote:
> I really don't' believe "best" is a great term.  Each source has a cost,
> and a benefit.  In Wisconsin, solar power isn't going to be a reliable
> source of energy, but likely will in New Mexico.  I think we need to get
> away from the one size fits all mentality, that's what's got us into
> trouble in the first place
> 
> Second even hydro power has its costs...  such as disrupting spawning
> activities of endangered species of fish as well as the mega-tons of
> gravel and sand that needed to be extracted to develop the concrete  dam
> structure. These are permanent damages to the ecosystem,  The same is
> true with ALL power sources
> 
> Ultimately we will continue to need power and our need will increase as
> our population and need for power grow, its just a matter of what we are
> willing to pay for it...  If we don't want new, different , and more
> power, the cost is that we stop driving our cars, stop heating our
> houses to 70F all winter and cooling our houses down to 70F  in the
> summer
> 
> There are rumors of 4-6 more power plants being built in the upper
> Midwest, as far as I know they are all planning to utilize cheap
> abundant coal.
> 
> 
> 
> Charles R. Bomar PhD
> Professor of Biology
> University of Wisconsin-Stout
> Menomonie, WI 54751
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 715-232-2562
>  
> 

Reply via email to