I would argue that the more "natural" forces of natural selection
(survival on account of resistance to disease/infection, better hunting
capabilities, avoidance of obviously fatal situations) may be working
only in non-developed (are there any?) or early-developing countries.
In highly developed countries, selection seems to be quite random --
survival being mostly attributable to being in the right places at the
right times (being near a hospital during a heart attack, being just off
the path of the drunk driver, NOT being the customer served the salad
with the e-coli, NOT having been born and raised in carcinogenic
surroundings, etc.)  We all like to think because we're smart (or think
we are), we have some kind of edge, but I just don't see it.  Maybe I'm
one of those who just THINKS I'm smart......

Cheers -

Linda Perelli Wright
Director of Special Projects
Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristina Pendergrass
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: current natural selection pressures

I guess the question is whether these or other-mentioned modern
alternatives are really affecting selection (as in decreasing
reproductive
fitness) or are simply having an effect on mortality...

Kristina Pendergrass


> How about modern alternatives to big predators such as traffic, 
> accidents with tools etc, abuse of alcohol and drugs, or a combination

> of all of the above? I would say that in these modern times, there is 
> still plenty of possibilities to get hurt.
>
> Jasja Dekker
>
> PhD student
> Resource Ecology Group
> Dept. Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University
>
> On 2/10/06 11:01 AM, "Buffington, Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>> This is another very broad question that has been bothering me
lately.
>
>> = Are there any current natural selective pressures on humans?  I'd 
>> say = this is mainly for developed countries.  I see lots of people 
>> that are = old enough to reproduce that never would have long ago.  I

>> hesisate to = list things that may have led to an early dimise but 
>> there are lots of = them.  As far as I know, there are no lions, 
>> bears
>
>> or wolves hanging out = in my office building waiting to pounce on 
>> the
>
>> old, very young, infirm, = or stupid.  Just curious.
>> =20
>> Matt Buffington
>> Indianapolis, IN
>

Reply via email to