I've come across a statistical mystery.  Any insight would be much appreciated.

I attempted to attach a figure to illustrate the problem, but the listserv
rejected it.  I can send it to anyone who thinks they may help.

The data concerns presence/absence data for aquatic insects across several
thousand streams.  We're looking to find the effect of land use change (i.e.
urban, agriculture, etc) on individual taxa.  In particular, we want to
determine if a specific land use has the potential to eliminate a taxa once
development reaches a certain point.  

To do this, my first approach went as follows:

1) Narrow down the data to the appropriate subset of physiographic provinces
where the specific insect is found 

2) Compare the cumulative frequency distribution of all watersheds (expected
CDF) to the actual CDF where the insects were collected (observed CDF) based
on different levels of land cover change 

3) Run a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test between the 2 distributions 

This worked fine until I came across the scenario of the insect Baetis in
relation to the variable agricultural development.   The the distribution
where the insect Baetis ocurred was very close to the expected.  In fact, in
the extreme right end of the distribution (where the stressor is highest),
observed vs. expected distributions were almost identical.  We visually
interpreted this to mean agriculture had little affect on whether or not
you'd see Baetis in a stream.

However...

The KS test stated otherwise; the distributions were highly significantly
different.  I attributed this to the high power of the KS test and the
sensitivity of the test near the middle of the curve.  Other similar tests
behaved similarly.  But as you would see in the figure (if you'd like me to
send it), Baetis survives at high levels of agriculture, even if variation
between the curves ocurrs earlier on (maybe ~40% agricultural development).

Does anyone know of a better approach?  I've tried a number of other
tests/approaches, but nothing gets me anywhere.  

Many thanks to anyone who could possibly help.

-Ryan Utz

PhD Student
University of Maryland
Appalachian Laboratory

Reply via email to