actually, this was addressed as an important consideration in the =
environmental economics course that I took.
=20
VISIT THE JOURNAL HERPETOLOGICAL CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY =
www.herpconbio.org <http://www.herpconbio.org>=20
=20
Malcolm L. McCallum
Assistant Professor
Department of Biological Sciences
Texas A&M University Texarkana
2600 Robison Rd.
Texarkana, TX 75501
O: 1-903-223-3134
H: 1-903-791-3843
Homepage: https://www.eagle.tamut.edu/faculty/mmccallum/index.html
=20

________________________________

From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news on behalf of =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/5/2006 5:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: SCB's carbon offset; precedent for ESA?



Right now the Society for Conservation Biology is polling its members to =
see how much they are willing to pay to offset SCB's carbon emissions, =
the vast majority of which stem from its members flying to the annual =
conference.  It's a good idea in principle and ESA should probably =
consider a similar approach.  However, what seems to be often overlooked =
in environmental and even ecological economics is that the act of =
expenditure itself entails the liquidation of natural capital somewhere =
and concommitant carbon release.

Imagine how much damage it would entail if we had to pay - using a =
ridiculous example to make the point - a trillion dollars to offset =
SCB's carbon.  A trillion dollars entails a lot of =
agricultural/extractive surplus (the origins of money), and regardless =
of how "green" the agriculture and extraction is, at that scale it would =
cause far more damage than that caused by SCB's carbon.=20

We need an estimate of per-dollar-natural-capital liquidation to make =
decisions about what price for carbon offsetting will actually pay a net =
environmental benefit.  This research need is a major application for =
those engaged in ecological footprinting and I am wondering if anyone =
has seen anything published yet in this regard.  I have seen figures on =
comparative energy intensity of nations' GDP; not the same though =
closely related...=20


Brian Czech, President
Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy
WWW.STEADYSTATE.ORG
Sign the position on economic growth at:
http://steadystate.org/PositiononEG.html

Reply via email to