Wayne raises some interesting points, most of which I agree with, but he
says a few things that seem to need challenging.  First, my American
Heritage Dictionary says "landscape" derives from the Dutch word for schap =
ship.  The online Free Dictionary goes back even further and says it derives
from the Indo-European route scap = state, condition.  See
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/landscape

Second, I'm not too sure what Wayne means by the comment "Anything done to
any 'landscape,' particularly agricultural (Fr. agri, "field" and cultus
"cut") ones, should increase biological diversity." Again, my dictionaries
show a somewhat different word derivation -- "agriculture" derives from
Latin ager = land and cultura = cultivation.  But the more important point
is that it's well accepted that modern landscape management can and does
result in decreased biological diversity in many systems.

Consider that in my part of the world diverse shrub-grassland systems have
been replaced by large and extensive wheatfields or crested-wheatgrass range
monocultures.  Multi-age diverse species forests have been replaced by
extensive single-age single-species tree farms. And the corn-soybean
monocultures of our midwest seem to be less biologically diverse than the
former grass-woodland prairies.

Granted, traditional farming has sometimes resulted in increased biological
diversity.  Again, in my part of the world smaller brush bordered
diversified farm fields once replaced less diverse oak-grass savannas, but
these have now been replaced with less diverse and larger grass seed fields.
And I've read that traditional coffee farms may have replaced less diverse
tropical forests, but these are now being replaced by even less diverse
coffee plantations.

Warren Aney
Senior Wildlife Ecologist
Tigard, OR

-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wayne Tyson
Sent: Friday, 16 June, 2006 14:51
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes and NCEAS proposal


Please see my [[comments]] within your text below.  It seems that I
corresponded at length with someone working there a few years ago,
but I can't remember her name.  I will not be submitting a proposal.

WT

PS: The term "landscape" is derived from the Old Dutch word "skep,"
meaning "to cut," to "hack," etc.  Its meaning has been altered by
semantic erosion over the years, but it may be useful to consider its
origins and the level of consciousness with respect to its
consequences, particularly in this context.  Certainly a
food-production system that requires less labor, materials, and
equipment, such as a biologically diverse ecosystem, whether by
accident or design, might be considered more, not less efficient and
bottom-line productive, than an exploitative, expedient, wasteful
"system" that comes from an unwarranted assumption that "increases"
are unlimited, whether through "Green Revolutions" or "Genetic
Engineering."  Such systems are, however, profitable in terms of
money extraction, particularly for export-based economies, aka
"cultural parasitism."

At 08:26 AM 6/16/2006, Fabrice De Clerck wrote:
>Hello All -
>
>After reading the NCEAS call for proposals regarding funding for
>Distributed Graduate Seminars (DGS) I would be interested in seeing
>if anyone out there would be like to develop a DGS on "Conservation
>of Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes". Here at CATIE in Costa
>Rica we have accomplished quite a bit of work and have some
>significant databases/experience on species conservation in pasture,
>coffee, and cacao landscapes.
>
>In particular, there are three principle questions I'd like to
>explore, though these would be open to consideration/discussion once
>partners are finalized:
>
>1) Can agricultural landscapes be managed for the conservation of
>biodiversity

[[Anything done to any "landscape," particularly agricultural (Fr.
agri, "field" and cultus "cut") ones, should increase biological
diversity.]]

>2) What is the relationship between biodiversity and the functioning
>(crop productivity, disease and pest resistance)

[[Monoculture favors predators of the crop concerned; biodiversity
(depending upon the species involved) can increase pest predator
populations and activity, improve crop plant nutrition (as in
influencing microbial populations that influence nutrient pathways),
and otherwise affect productivity (e.g. shade, water
infiltration/percolation, improved respiration, erosion
reduction).  Crop genetic diversity can affect disease resistance and
altered environments can have direct and indirect effects on pest
activity.  Biodiversity also can (depending upon species,
populations, assemblages, structure, etc.) adversely affect crop
production; however, some such can be involved in tradeoff phenomena
that affect production and crop quality.]]

>3) To link data in Costa Rica, and potential partners in the US, what
>is the role of semi-natural habitat in agricultural landscapes play
>in the conservation of migratory species, particularly those species
>that migrate between/through Costa Rica and North American landscapes.

[[An excellent, if seldom-considered factor.]]


>Both ecological questions and social questions, such as what drives
>farmers to conserve on-farm biodiversity could be open for
>consideration.

[[Well-entrenched cultural customs, such as those which may have had
a role in the demise of certain Pre-Columbian cultures, are not
necessarily optimal, but merely expedient.  Continued, persistent
demonstration of the results of biodiversity (including mixed-crop,
non-tillage systems may be essential, as well as careful integration
such that the changes, their evaluation and further development, are
rendered a product of a given culture rather than that of outsiders
with outsize egos.]]


>If your are interested, please drop me an email. We are particularly
>interested in institutions that serve high proportions of of groups
>underrepresented in science. For more information on the NCEAS call
>for proposals, please visit: http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/opportunity/
>rfp.html
>
>Cheers,
>Fabrice

Reply via email to