Paul,

The Sac-Yolo Mosquito Abatement District is following a rather robotic 
rule-of-thumb (developed for other diseases) that causes them to spray 
automatically when the disease prevalence in mosquitoes reaches 5 per 
thousand. This does not take into account the effects on stream 
invertebrates (which have now been shown to be severe) or on the 
long-term epidemiology of West Nile (which has not been modeled). No 
risk-benefit analysis is done. There is no thoughtful, researched 
evaluation. When 5 of 1000 mosquitoes have West Nile, they spray.

This is not a validation of spraying. It is an affirmation of 
bureaucratic inertia.

Patrick

Paul Cherubini wrote:
> On July 21 Patrick Foley wrote:
>
>   
>> As for Sacramento-Yolo West Nile spraying [in August 2005]:
>> The Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito Abatement District carefully avoided a 
>> public discussion of their spraying in Davis, the home of UCDavis, until 
>> after their very dubious spraying strategy was already decided. When 
>> they did attempt to conduct a no-public-discussion "informational" 
>> meeting to a room full of scientists, they were met with a good deal of 
>> scorn. Very little serious epidemiological work has gone into the 
>> spraying plans.
>>     
>
> Yet after listening to the arguments of the anti-spray segment of the 
> academic community at UC Davis for the past year, the Sacramento-Yolo 
> Mosquito Abatement District has still decided in favor of aerially spraying 
> the city of Davis, including the UC Davis campus, this summer.  In fact, a 
> Davis newspaper announced today that the aerial spraying of Davis
> will take place later this week:
>
> http://www.davisenterprise.com/articles/2006/07/31/news/153new1.txt
>
> "On Thursday and Friday nights, airplanes will spray pesticide
> over Davis and Woodland in an effort to slow the spread of
> West Nile virus."
>
> "The Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District, working 
> with UC Davis, will trap for mosquitoes before and after spraying. Last 
> year in Sacramento County, spraying was successful in killing better than 
> 75 percent of the mosquito population."
>
> The chemical insecticide contains piperonyl butoxide.  According to  
> http://www.stopwestnilesprayingnow.org/Risk.htm piperonyl butoxide 
> "has been shown to induce DNA damage in several different assays for 
> genotoxicity and also to function as an endocrine disruptor." 
>
> Evidently the Sacramento-Yolo governement public health authorities 
> has not found the anti-spray arguments of the academic community very 
> compelling. 
>
> Paul Cherubini
> El Dorado, Calif.
>
>   

Reply via email to