Also see:

1. A discussion on ECOLOG-L on publication and authorship - dated around 
November 2003
2. The American Psychological Association publication "APA Monitor" vol. 
29 no. 12 December 1998 (online)
3. Fine & Kurdek 1993 American Psychologist 48(11) 1141-1147
4. References within the above.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Sarmia et al. - in anticipation of a thread that may develop on the topic
>of authorship, and as a bit of a plug for our upcoming paper:
>
>In an article scheduled for the October issue of Frontiers in Ecology and
>the Environment, we explore trends in authorship in ecology, discuss the
>need for guidelines for author inclusion and byline order, and recommend
>several simple ways to better communicate the contribution of individual
>authors to the readership at large.
>
>The citation is:
>
>Weltzin, J.F., R.T. Belote, L.T. Williams, J.K. Keller, and E.C. Engel.
>2006.  Authorship in ecology: attribution, accountability, and
>responsibility.  Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4(8):in press.
>
>I would be pleased to distribute a pdf reprint of the article after 1
>October to anyone who requests a copy.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jake
>
>Jake F. Weltzin
>Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
>569 Dabney Hall
>University of Tennessee
>Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1610 USA
>Cell phone: 865-207-5773
>Fax: 865-974-3067
>E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Homepage: http://eeb.bio.utk.edu/weltzin/
>********************************************************************
>
>
>
>-----"Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news"
><[email protected]> wrote: -----
>
>
>To: [email protected]
>From: Samia Carrillo-Percastegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent by: "Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news"
><[email protected]>
>Date: 09/15/2006 08:18PM
>Subject: Guidelines for Authorship
>
>Can anyone give me some input on what are or should be the guidelines
>for authorship a peer reviewed paper?
>thanks a lot.
>
>
>
>
>Samia Carrillo-Percastegui
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Remaining silent about the destruction of nature is an endorsement of
>that destruction
>  
>

Reply via email to