As many of you no doubt know, the Summary for Policymakers from the 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Working Group II - that's the 
section on climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, the 
section most relevant to ecologists - was released yesterday. 

There is already no lack of controversy over the ‘softened’ wording used 
in sections on adaptation, on rates of extinction and on coral reefs. I'm 
as disappointed as anyone that the scientific findings in the IPCC full 
report, to be released in the fall, are filtered by diplomats before being 
included in the Summary for Policymakers. This is bound to dominate the 
public discourse over the next few days.

That all being said, as someone working on climate change impacts, but not 
involved in the IPCC, I have a simple suggestion. 

Read the summary report yourself (http://www.ipcc.ch). Don’t rely only 
information about the report that has been even further filtered by 
columnists, lobby organizations, pundits or whomever, whether left or 
right, green or brown, skeptics or alarmists. 

If we all get too obsessed over the politics, the IPCC reports risk being 
regarded as just another partisan publication on climate science, rather 
than what it is, the most thorough reading of the scientific literature on 
climate change.

Simon Donner

-- 
Simon Donner
Woodrow Wilson School 
Princeton University
http://simondonner.blogspot.com


 

Reply via email to