I'm not sure how much we can generalise here. There is obviously a big 
difference between the environmental impact of an electric vehicle that you 
charge from a diesel generator in your back yard and one that gets its 
charge from hydro. I am also not clear on the total environmental cost of 
biodiesel.

Bill Silvert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: Fuel efficient/zero emissions automobiles


> Ernie,
>
> Could you  provide some data source for this claim?  I understand
> that electricity is produced with fossil fuels but I also believe
> that electric cars are so much more efficient  than internal
> combustion heat engines at providing transportation.  So how do the
> efficiencies compare between CO2 emissions at the source (tailpipe vs
> smokestack)?
>
> David
> On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> Electric cars and plug-in hybrids are only marginally better than
>> ordinary
>> hybrids in terms of energy consumption and CO2 emissions.  They
>> only appear  to
>> be better because most of the energy waste and CO2 happens "outside
>> the box,"
>>  back at the power plant.
>>
>> The best car today in terms of CO2 emissions is a diesel car using
>> biodiesel
>> fuel.  You can find this documented in many places.  The  best current
>> information will probably be found at _www.auto.xprize.org_
>> (http://www.auto.xprize.org)
>> Or, search on Wang, Argonne National Laboratory.  I can supply
>> additional
>> information to those that are interested.
>>
>> We should not be overly optimistic yet about saving the planet with
>> better
>> cars.  Consumption of fossil energy is one of the top three
>> environmental
>> problems on earth, and cars are at its center.  Most of the
>> planet's  organisms
>> may be lost before we get this one under control.
>>
>> Ernie Rogers
>> Driving for efficiency-- 65 mpg
>>
>> -------------------------------------
>> Wirt Atmar said,
>>
>> Given  the level of concern that people have expressed about
>> reducing  their
>> ecological footprint, particularly in regard to greenhouse gases
>> and  fossil
>> fuel
>> usage, I thought that I would mention some of the work that's
>> being done in
>> automobiles that you may not be aware of.
>>
>> This next  statement is the kind of thing that's going to get me
>> kicked out of
>> the  ecology club, but as Dick Cheney has said, "conservation is a
>> personal
>> virtue." It's something that you can't force on someone else. It's
>> been
>> suggested that everyone ought to proactively -- and with some
>> significant
>> self-sacrifice -- either drive 1970 Tercels or ride bicycles  with
>> milk
>> baskets
>> bungee-corded to the back of them. As a practical matter,  none of
>> this will
>> ever
>> happen, and it is somewhat foolish to ever imagine  that it will.
>> If you want
>> to
>> change the world, you have to do it in a  manner that will be
>> economically
>> profitable to manufacturers and  simultaneously attractive to
>> consumers.
>>
>> But in that regard, people are  farther along at building comfortable,
>> attractive
>> energy-efficient,  virtually zero-polluting automobiles than you
>> might think.
>> These vehicles  will have not only very close to zero greenhouse
>> gas/pollutant
>> emissions  but will also have truly extraordinary mileage, and I
>> thought that
>>  you
>> might like to see them. <SNIP>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************** See what's free at http://
>> www.aol.com.
>
> David Bryant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 978-697-6123
>
> 

Reply via email to