David: I've used the camera from CID that Martin mentioned; it comes on a self-leveling wand, which is a nice alternative to setting up a tripod. The set up may cost a bit more than other alternatives, but the time savings in the field may save you money in the long run.
- Cara ______________________________________________________________ Cara R. Nelson, PhD College of Forest Resources Box 352100 University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195-2100 On Thu, 17 May 2007, MARTIN DOVCIAK wrote: > David, > > CI-110 Digital Plant Canopy Imager seems like it could be a good alternative, > but I have not it used it to comment first-hand. Here is the web page... > > http://www.cid-inc.com/products/ci-110.html > > Martin > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Martin Dovciak, Ph.D. http://staff.washington.edu/mdovciak/ > College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- David Zeleny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dear collegues, >> >> just short question for those working with forest canopy analysis, >> particularly with gap light analysis: what kind of hardware (cameras and >> lenses) are you using? The common set we were using up to now in our >> department - Nikon Coolpix 4500 + fish-eye Nikon FC-E8 - is sold out and not >> available any more, so don't you know about some reasonable alternative? I >> would be happy for any advice or recommendation! >> >> Thanks! >> David Zeleny >> ------------------------------------------------ >> Department of Botany and Zoology >> Masaryk University Brno >> Kotlarska 2 >> CZ-611 37 Brno >> Czech Republic >> http://www.sci.muni.cz/botany/zeleny/english.php >> ------------------------------------------------ >
