There may be some merit to including environmental education in the  
high-stakes mandatory "No Child Left Behind" requirements.  However, from  what 
I have 
witnessed while doing high-school level observations, a better  approach 
might be to advocate for a saner educational system that encourages  true 
growth 
and learning rather than cramming for frantic tests in narrow fields  at the 
expense of breadth of education. 
 
What I witnessed:  in a biology classroom a student raised a hand and  asked 
a deep, involved, meaningful question about genetics.   The  teacher's curt 
and hurried response was, "Don't worry about that.  You  don't need to know 
that 
for the test...."



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

Reply via email to