Kelly Decker wrote: > > The George C. Marshall Institute has launched a > new PR campaign to suggest that scientists are biased in their findings of > global climate change due to the fact that there is grant monies to study > global climate change.
> It's pure talking points for those who do not want to see the > world make headway against greenhouse gas emissions. Kelly, on Oct. 18 Maiken Winter wrote: "Here is a call for scientists to address congress about funding research on how to best protect species in the face of climate change." "it is necessary but not sufficient to reduce greenhouse gas pollution." In other words, scientists are not simply interested in seeing federal money spent on direct and immediate solutions to greenhouse gas pollution. They are seeking federal funding to study, monitor and manage species that might be substantially affected by climate change - funding that could create or enhance the professional careers of many hundreds, perhaps thousands of them. So naturally a situation like this raises suspicions. Paul Cherubini El Dorado, Calif.
