While the break down of these products may be unknown, I believe the
production of cotton involves a lot of really nasty herbicides and
pesticides, although I do not recall which ones!

Malcolm


On Thu, October 25, 2007 9:50 pm, Elaine Joyal wrote:
> Malcolm,
>
> As far as I know plastics, including polyester (and too many other
> products), are petroleum derivatives.  Rayon (and acetate and such) is
> made
> from wood pulp that has been chemically treated and is then extruded
> through
> pores to create a fiber.  Other than the feel of rayon that it's not made
> from petroleum is another reason why many people prefer it.  What I don't
> know and would love to hear is if someone has done an environmental impact
> analysis of the relative trade-offs of using products that come from
> petroleum and don't break down readily in the environment etc. versus
> something like rayon (or even cotton for that matter) that comes from a
> renewable resource but is then chemically treated etc. Come to think of
> it,
> I have no idea how rayon breaks down.  Anyone?
>
>
>   Elaine
>
>
> On 10/25/07, Malcolm McCallum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Isn't just about every piece of plastic, man made fiber (rayon,
>> polyester), etc. created from petroleum?
>>
>> It seems like I read that somewhere, but I don't want to quote it as
>> fact
>> because I cannot now find the info.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, October 25, 2007 12:12 am, Zachary Wilson wrote:
>> > Aren't "overpopulation" and human contributions to climate change both
>> > related to peak oil? Peak oil is the end of cheap, easy-to-get oil
>> (i.e.
>> the
>> > oil that gives us fuel and fertilizer to feed 7 billion) and declining
>> > production. Overpopulation and our contribution to climate change are
>> the
>> > result of cheap, easy-to-get oil. Doesn't that mean peak oil is the
>> > beginning of the end of overpopulation and human-induced climate
>> change?
>> > Is that an oversimplification?
>> >
>> > - zac wilson
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Date:    Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:32:18 -0600
>> >> From:    Randy Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Subject: Re: Denial * 2: Climate Change and Economic
>> >>
>> >> I would add the topics of overpopulation and 'end of oil' as being of
>> >> vital importance. I am perplexed as to why we do not engage the topic
>> >> of overpopulation as that is the fundamental cause of the problems
>> >> under discussion. People on this list have argued that we can
>> >> continue population increase. As Joe indicated, is overpopulation
>> >> also not trendy, is it too taboo, or are we all too steeped in
>> >> denial? Why do we continue to discuss the bandaids rather than the
>> >> root cause?
>> >>
>> >> randy
>> >> =======================================
>> >> RK Bangert, PhD
>> >> P.O. Box 335
>> >> Mancos, CO 81328
>> >>
>>
>> Malcolm L. McCallum
>> Assistant Professor of Biology
>> Editor Herpetological Conservation and Biology
>> http://www.herpconbio.org
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>
> --
>


Malcolm L. McCallum
Assistant Professor of Biology
Editor Herpetological Conservation and Biology
http://www.herpconbio.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to