** Low Priority **

Also, "instructional methods" don't mean so much at higher levels. At
the graduate level especially, students are adults and should be able to
develop the necessary understanding in any environment. We are all going
to approach each discipline differently. While I can see, and I do,
sticking to the textbook more with freshman undergraduate students, and
have used textbooks as principle sources in graduate courses, if all a
student comes back at me with in a graduate course is what is in some
textbook, I would not consider that effort a passing effort at the
graduate level. I make it a point to give graduate students questions of
a sort they have not seen in class, but require the use of the
principles learned during the course when creating tests. A student who
cannot handle this is not adequately prepared for graduate level
education, and is most certainly not qualified to be awarded a graduate
degree. Real science doesn't come with a textbook!

"So easy it seemed once found, which yet
unfound most would have thought impossible"

John Milton
________________________________________

Robert G. Hamilton
Department of Biological Sciences
Mississippi College
P.O. Box 4045
200 South Capitol Street
Clinton, MS 39058
Phone: (601) 925-3872 
FAX (601) 925-3978
>>> Jeff Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/07 4:11 PM >>>
Speaking as a former high school teacher and current environmental
science graduate student, I'd like to comment on instructors tossing
the textbook from their courses.  I appreciate _supplements_ to the
textbook, such as selected websites, journal articles, etc. I have
always had a problem, however, with instructors whose only "reading
material" is something that they wrote themselves (whether it was a
coursepack or something more formal). Every student learns differently,
and not all students will relate well to any particular instructor's
teaching style. If the course follows a decent textbook (even if
assigned readings are not required), then a motivated student has a
fall-back instructional method if lectures are not working (read the
book!). If the only reading available is something that the instructor
wrote, it is usually "more of the same" that the student heard in
lecture. An instructor-written textbook rarely sheds new light on the
subject or teaches with a different explanation of the concept. 
So...course readers and other supplemental materials are good, but be
very careful that students have the opportunity to hear from a variety
of instructional voices, not just one.
Thanks for listening, 

Jeff Jewett
Montana State University

Reply via email to